Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;13(2):89-94.
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709213. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Radiographs in the Diagnosis of Little and/or Ring Carpometacarpal Joint Injuries

Sami Hassan  1 , Abdul Aziz  1 , Nicholas D Downing  1 , Ryan W Trickett  2
Affiliations

Sensitivity and Specificity of Radiographs in the Diagnosis of Little and/or Ring Carpometacarpal Joint Injuries

Sami Hassan et al. J Hand Microsurg. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction Little and ring finger carpometacarpal joints (CMCJs) injuries are commonly missed due to misinterpretation of radiographs. We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of four different radiographic views. Materials and Methods Radiographs (posteroanterior [PA], lateral [LAT], pronated oblique [POL], and supinated oblique [SOL] views) showing normal findings or little/ring finger CMCJ injuries were shown to two cohorts of orthopaedic trainees and a cohort of emergency nurse practitioners. Results The POL view performed best in all three testing scenarios. The SOL view performed least well. The combination of a PA, true LAT, and POL identified 78% of injuries correctly. In no cases did the SOL view correctly identify an injury when the other three views had been interpreted as normal. Conclusion We recommend a combination of the PA, POL, and LAT views in diagnosing these injuries. Where doubt remains, cross-sectional imaging is essential.

Keywords: carpometacarpal; dislocation; fracture; hamate; metacarpal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The four fracture–dislocation radiograph sets used throughout the study demonstrating the fracture–dislocation with a bony injury to the hamate.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The metacarpal cascade lines.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Multiple views in a patient with a punch injury. The tangential pronated oblique as evidenced by the lateral projection of the fourth and fifth metacarpals shows a small fragment corresponding with the dorsal lip of the hamate. At surgery, the fifth metacarpal was easily dislocatable, and transarticular wiring was performed. LAT, lateral; PA, posteroanterior.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hodgson P D, Shewring D J. The ‘metacarpal cascade lines’; use in the diagnosis of dislocations of the carpometacarpal joints. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007;32(03):277–281. - PubMed
    1. Yoshida R, Shah M A, Patterson R M. Buford WL Jr, Knighten J, Viegas SF. Anatomy and pathomechanics of ring and small finger carpometacarpal joint injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(06):1035–1043. - PubMed
    1. Chong A K, Chew W Y. An isolated ring finger metacarpal shaft fracture?–beware an associated little finger carpometacarpal joint dislocation. J Hand Surg [Br] 2004;29(06):629–631. - PubMed
    1. Pullen C, Richardson M, McCullough K, Jarvis R. Injuries to the ulnar carpometacarpal region: are they being underdiagnosed? Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(04):257–261. - PubMed
    1. Petrie P W, Lamb D W. Fracture-subluxation of base of fifth metacarpal. Hand. 1974;6(01):82–86. - PubMed