Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec:103:314-326.
doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

Interaction of delaminations and matrix cracks in a CFRP plate, Part I: A test method for model validation

Affiliations

Interaction of delaminations and matrix cracks in a CFRP plate, Part I: A test method for model validation

Mark McElroy et al. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Isolating and observing the damage mechanisms associated with low-velocity impact in composites using traditional experiments can be challenging, due to damage process complexity and high strain rates. In this work, a new test method is presented that provides a means to study, in detail, the interaction of common impact damage mechanisms, namely delamination, matrix cracking, and delamination-migration, in a context less challenging than a real impact event. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer specimens containing a thin insert in one region were loaded in a biaxial-bending state of deformation. As a result, three-dimensional damage processes, involving delaminations at no more than three different interfaces that interact with one another via transverse matrix cracks, were observed and documented using ultrasonic testing and x-ray computed tomography. The data generated by the test is intended for use in numerical model validation. Simulations of this test are included in Part II of this paper.

Keywords: A. Laminates; B. Delamination; C. Transverse cracking; D. Mechanical testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Typical low-velocity impact damage in a composite plate.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Test schematic.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Biaxial-bending test specimen.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Quasi-static test setup.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Impact test details.
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
Multiple load cycles and summary force-displacement curve for specimen XP3-2.
Figure 7:
Figure 7:
Quasi-static force-displacement data.
Figure 8:
Figure 8:
UT scans of damage in Layup 1.
Figure 9:
Figure 9:
Illustration of delamination migration in a [0/90/0] layup.
Figure 10:
Figure 10:
Delamination growth and migration detail (CT images from specimen XP3-6).
Figure 11:
Figure 11:
CT images of transverse matrix cracks forming incrementally before delamination growth initiation (specimen XP3-6).
Figure 12:
Figure 12:
UT scans of damage in Layup 2.
Figure 13:
Figure 13:
CT scans showing “staggered” and simple migration in Layup 2.
Figure 14:
Figure 14:
UT scans of damage in Layup 3.
Figure 15:
Figure 15:
Delamination area versus specimen deflection for all quasi-static tests.
Figure 16:
Figure 16:
Low-velocity impact force-displacement data.
Figure 17:
Figure 17:
Representative UT scans of damage in impact and quasi-static tests.
Figure 18:
Figure 18:
Energy required for initiation of delamination in the quasi-static and impact tests.
Figure 19:
Figure 19:
Investigation on error in force-displacement data from impact tests.
Figure 20:
Figure 20:
Measured forces from hammer and impact test load cells for centered and off centered load conditions. Data points are fit with a solid linear trendline to aid in comparison with the dashed line.
Figure 21:
Figure 21:
SEM images showing cusp orientation.
Figure 22:
Figure 22:
SEM images showing transverse matrix crack face (Layup 2).

References

    1. Building block approach for composite structures, in: Composite Materials Handbook (Volume 3, Chapter 4) CMH-17, Wichita State University, National Institute for Aviation Research, 2012.
    1. Feraboli P, Composite materials strength determination within the current certification methodology for aircraft structures, Journal of Aircraft 46 (4) (2009) 1365–1374.
    1. Allison J, Integrated computational materials engineering: A perspective on progress and future steps, JOM: The Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 63 (4) (2011) 15.
    1. Allison J, Backman D, Christodoulou L, Integrated computational materials engineering: a new paradigm for the global materials profession, JOM: The Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 58 (11) (2006) 25–27.
    1. Apelian D, Integrated computational materials engineering (ICME): A model for the future?, JOM: Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 60 (7) (2008) 9–10.

LinkOut - more resources