Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 31:12:564097.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.564097. eCollection 2021.

Association Between Digoxin Use and Cancer Incidence: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study With Competing Risk Analysis

Affiliations

Association Between Digoxin Use and Cancer Incidence: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study With Competing Risk Analysis

Chi-Jung Tai et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: Previous studies neglected death as a critical competing risk while estimating the cancer risk for digoxin users. Therefore, the current study aims to assess the effectiveness of digoxin on cancer prevention by competing risk analysis. Methods: We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research database between 1998 and 2010. After one-to-one propensity score-matching from 36,160 patients with defined criteria, we enrolled 758 patients both in digoxin and β-blocker group for further analysis. Results: The results showed that the digoxin group had higher all-cause mortality than the β-blocker group in the 4- year (10.4 vs. 4.9%) and 8 years (13.6 vs. 7.0%) follow-up. The subdistribution HR of cancer incidence in the digoxin group compared to the β-blocker group was 1.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-3.01) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.01-2.15) in the 4 years and 8 years follow-up, respectively. Conclusions: The result of our study showed the usage of digoxin has no benefit in cancer prevention compared with β-blocker. The possibility of β-blocker as a new drug candidate for cancer prevention needs further clinical evaluation. The current study also emphasized the necessity of competing risk analysis applying to similar clinical researches.

Keywords: cancer; competing risk analysis; digoxin; propensity-score matching; β-blocker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study flow chart. Nhird, national health insurance research database.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Study design.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Cumulative cancer incidence between the two groups after 1:1 propensity-score matching by competing risk analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahern T. P., Lash T. L., Sørensen H. T., Pedersen L. (2008). Digoxin treatment is associated with an increased incidence of breast cancer: a population-based case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 10, R102. 10.1186/bcr2205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahern T. P., Tamimi R. M., Rosner B. A., Hankinson S. E. (2014). Digoxin use and risk of invasive breast cancer: evidence from the Nurses' Health Study and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 144, 427–435. 10.1007/s10549-014-2886-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Austin P. C. (2009). Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Statist. Med. 28, 3083–3107. 10.1002/sim.3697 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bangalore S., Kumar S., Kjeldsen S. E., Makani H., Grossman E., Wetterslev J., et al. (2011). Antihypertensive drugs and risk of cancer: network meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 324 168 participants from randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 12, 65–82. 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70260-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berry S. D., Ngo L., Samelson E. J., Kiel D. P. (2010). Competing risk of death: an important consideration in studies of older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 58, 783–787. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources