Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 31:12:641465.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641465. eCollection 2021.

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

Affiliations

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

Nicolás Contreras-Barraza et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This article presents a scientometric study regarding entrepreneurship and its relationship with wellbeing. The study presents a systematic review and measures impact and relational character to identify the relevance of countries, research organizations, and authors in the field of entrepreneurial wellbeing. The study poses the following research questions: What is the nature of the evolution of scientific knowledge in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What is the nature of the concentration in terms of geographical distribution and co-authorship level of knowledge production in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What are the knowledge trends in knowledge production for entrepreneurial wellbeing literature? The contribution of this research is two-fold. First, in terms of methodology, it contributes study into the use of a more robust approach to search for the scientometric trends about entrepreneurship wellbeing in addition to the PRISMA review tools and the PICOS eligibility criteria. Secondly, the study presents research updates in the search for results for the last 2 years of knowledge production. This upgrade is particularly important in a research field that presents exponential growth, where 2019 and 2020 presented almost double the amount of knowledge production compared to 2017 and 2018.

Keywords: entrepreneurship; happiness; job-satisfaction; mental-health; satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
World scientific production growth.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Economic geography of scientific production.
Figure 4
Figure 4
National co-authorship.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Organizational co-authorship.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Outstanding Key Word Plus-KWP.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Intermediary organizations clusters.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Key terms.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmad N., Mahmood A., Han H., Ariza-Montes A., Vega-Muñoz A., Din M., et al. . (2021). Sustainability as a “new normal” for modern businesses: are smes of pakistan ready to adopt it? Sustainability 13:1944. 10.3390/su13041944 - DOI
    1. Albort-Morant G., Henseler J., Leal-Millán A., Cepeda-Carrión G. (2017). Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability 9:1011. 10.3390/su9061011 - DOI
    1. Andrade-Valbuena N. A., Merigo-Lindahl J. M., Olavarrieta-Soto S. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of entrepreneurial orientation. World J. Entrepr. Manage. Sustain. Dev. 15, 45–69. 10.1108/WJEMSD-08-2017-0048 - DOI
    1. Andrejuk K. (2019). Ukrainian immigrants and entrepreneurship drain: towards a concept of governance-induced migration. East Eur. Politic. Soc. 33, 899–916. 10.1177/0888325419835018 - DOI
    1. Arenius P., Minniti M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ. 24, 233–247. 10.1007/s11187-005-1984-x - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources