Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 10:6:619677.
doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.619677. eCollection 2021.

"I'm Going to Stop Myself Before Someone Stops Me": Complicating Narratives of Volitional Substance Use Treatment

Affiliations

"I'm Going to Stop Myself Before Someone Stops Me": Complicating Narratives of Volitional Substance Use Treatment

David Frank et al. Front Sociol. .

Abstract

Background: Often people assume that entry into drug treatment is a voluntary action for persons who use drugs (PWUD). This narrative informs the organizational and regulatory structure of most treatment programs and consequently affects patients' ability to exert agency over their own treatment. Yet, this view ignores the complex interplay between individual and structural factors in peoples' decision-making processes, particularly among people who use drugs who are stigmatized and criminalized. Treatment programs that assume voluntary entry may lack appropriate services for the populations of treatment seekers that they serve. Methods: This paper uses semi-structured interviews with 42 participants in Opioid Substitution Treatment (OST) (including patients, clinic doctors and staff, and advocates) informed by one of the author's own lived experience in OST, to examine patients' treatment decisions, and in particular, if and how, the structural context of drugs' illegality/criminalization affected their willingness to pursue treatment. A Critical Discourse Analysis was used to identify key themes. Results: Interview data demonstrates that most people who use drugs enter treatment under constrained conditions related to drugs' illegality. Themes that emerged included: 1. A feeling of limited choices due to drugs' illegality; 2. Peer and family pressure; 3. Fear of losing children; and 4. Internalized stigma (i.e. feeling they are dirty or bad for using). Conclusion: Narratives that frame PWUD's treatment decisions as volitional provide political cover to policies that criminalize PWUD by obscuring their effect on PWUD's treatment decisions. Treatment models, particularly those that serve highly criminalized populations, should be re-conceptualized outside of normative narratives of individual choice, and be broadened to understand how larger structures constrain choices. By looking at macro-level factors, including the interplay of criminalization and drug treatment, programs can begin to understand the complexity of PWUD motivations to enter drug treatment. Recognizing the role of the War on Drugs as a force of oppression for people who use drugs, and that their treatment decisions are made within that setting, may enable people in treatment, and providers, to develop more productive ways of interacting with one another. Additionally, this may lead to better retention in treatment programs.

Keywords: criminalization; methadone maintenance treatment; patient agency; stigmatized populations; treatment decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alderks C. (2017). Trends in the Use of Methadone/Buprenorphine, and extended-release naltrexone at substance abuse treatment facilities: 2003-1015. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA. - PubMed
    1. Allison J. C., Ross A. (2014). The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment: patients, programs, services, and outcome. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media.
    1. Bell J., Zador D. (2000). A risk-benefit analysis of methadone maintenance treatment. Drug Saf. 22 (3), 179–190. 10.2165/00002018-200022030-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bloom L. R. (1998). Under the sign of hope: feminist methodology and narrative interpretation. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    1. Campbell N. D. (2011). From “magic bullets” to medical maintenance. Suzanne fraser is associate professor in the centre for women’s studies and gender research, school of political and social inquiry. Melbourne, Australia: Faculty of Arts, Monash University. She also holds a research appointment with the National Drug Research Institute at Curtin University, 122.