Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 24:6:624909.
doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.624909. eCollection 2021.

Predicting the Patriarchal Politics of Pandemics From Mary Shelley to COVID-19

Affiliations

Predicting the Patriarchal Politics of Pandemics From Mary Shelley to COVID-19

Eileen Hunt Botting. Front Sociol. .

Abstract

I examine the predictive powers of the political science fictions of Mary Shelley, Octavia Butler, and Margaret Atwood for understanding the patriarchal-or men-dominant-dynamics of the politics of pandemics in the twenty-first century. Like her literary followers in post-apocalyptic plague literature, Butler and Atwood, Shelley foresaw that the twenty-first century would be the age of lethal pandemics. Their post-apocalyptic fictions also projected the ways that patriarchal and authoritarian forms of populism could shape the cultural circumstances that can turn a local outbreak of a new and deadly contagious disease, like COVID-19, into a politically chaotic and economically devastating global plague. Modern feminist political science fiction born of Shelley's great pandemic novel The Last Man (1826) is seemingly clairvoyant not because of any supernatural powers of the authors but rather because of their studied attention to the wisdom of plague literature, the lessons of epidemic history, and the political dynamics of patriarchy and populism.

Keywords: COVID-19; Margaret Atwood; Mary Shelley; Octavia Butler; dystopian literature; patriarchy and masculinity; populism and democracy; women's rights.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Abi-Hassan S. (2017). “Populism and gender,” The Oxford Handbook of Populism, eds C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, and P. Ostiguy (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ). 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.16 - DOI
    1. Ackerly B. (2020). Populism, ‘anti' ideologies, and feminist coalitions. Front. Sociol. 5:65. 10.3389/fsoc.2020.620065 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ackerly B. A. (2016). Girls rising for human rights: not magic, politics. J. Int. Polit. Theory 12, 26–41. 10.1177/1755088215613626 - DOI
    1. Aguirre A. (2017). Octavia Butler's prescient vision of a zealot elected to make America great again. The New Yorker. Available online at: https://www.newyorker.com/books/second-read/octavia-butlers-prescient-vi...
    1. Armitage D. (2017). Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

LinkOut - more resources