Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 27:33:100771.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100771. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Esophageal pressure monitoring for airway management during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Yu-Ki Iwasaki  1 , Yuhi Fujimoto  1 , Eiichiro Oka  1 , Kanako Ito Hagiwara  1 , Kenta Takahashi  1 , Ippei Tsuboi  2 , Hiroshi Hayashi  1 , Kenji Yodogawa  1 , Meiso Hayashi  1 , Yasushi Miyauchi  3 , Wataru Shimizu  1
Affiliations

Esophageal pressure monitoring for airway management during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Yu-Ki Iwasaki et al. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. .

Abstract

Background: Respiratory management during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is important for the efficacy and safety of the procedure. Obstructive apnea due to an upper airway obstruction might cause serious complications including air embolisms and cardiac tamponade. However, real time monitoring of upper airway obstructions during catheter ablation has not been established. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate esophageal pressure monitoring for respiratory management during catheter ablation of AF.

Methods and results: Twenty-four consecutive patients (20 men and 4 women; mean age, 61 ± 13 years) with AF who underwent esophageal pressure monitoring during catheter ablation of AF were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups. One was the obstructive apnea (OA) group (n = 17), which required airway management tools including nasal airways and/or non-invasive positive airway pressure (NPPV) and the other was the control group (n = 7), which did not require airway management. Esophageal pressure measurements were obtained in all patients, and the OA group exhibited a substantial negative esophageal pressure as compared to the control group (-41.48 ± 19.58 vs. -12.42 ± 5.77 mmHg, p < 0.001). Airway management in the OA group immediately improved the negative esophageal pressure and returned to a normal range (-41.48 ± 19.58 vs. -16 ± 8.1 mmHg, 0 < 0.001) along with a recovery from desaturation.

Conclusions: Esophageal pressure monitoring was a simple and effective method for the evaluation and management of obstructive apnea during AF catheter ablation.

Keywords: Airway management; Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Esophageal pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Esophageal pressure monitoring system combined with the esophageal temperature probe. An esophageal pressure line was connected to a pressure transducer.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A: Esophageal pressure curve without obstructive apnea. There are periodical changes in the esophageal pressure associated with the respiratory cycle. The nadir of the esophageal pressure was approximately −10 to −15 mmHg. B: Esophageal pressure curve during obstructive apnea. A substantial deep negative esophageal pressure was recorded, and the nadir of the esophageal pressure was −50 mmHg.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A: Time course of the effect of the nasal airway during the obstructive apnea. The nasal airway insertion immediately improved the substantial negative esophageal pressure. B: The effect of the airway management on the esophageal pressure and oxygen saturation in the obstructive apnea group. Pre: Before the airway management, Post: After the airway management.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Inoue H., Fujiki A., Origasa H., Ogawa S., Okumura K., Kubota I. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the general population of Japan: an analysis based on periodic health examination. Int. J. Cardiol. 2009;137:102–107. - PubMed
    1. Calkins H., Hindricks G., Cappato R., Kim Y.H., Saad E.B., Aguinaga L. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary. Europace: Eur. Pacing, Arrhythmias, Cardiac Electrophysiol.: J. Working Groups On Cardiac Pacing, Arrhythmias, Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2018;20:157–208. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marrouche N.F., Brachmann J., Andresen D., Siebels J., Boersma L., Jordaens L. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:417–427. - PubMed
    1. Okamatsu H., Okumura K. Strategy and outcome of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation- impact of progress in the mapping and ablation technologies. Circ. J.: Off. J. Japanese Circ. Soc. 2017;82:2–9. - PubMed
    1. Michowitz Y., Rahkovich M., Oral H., Zado E.S., Tilz R., John S. Effects of sex on the incidence of cardiac tamponade after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: results from a worldwide survey in 34 943 atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Circ. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2014;7:274–280. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources