Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Sep 1;49(9):1504-1512.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005037.

Mechanism of a Flexible ICU Visiting Policy for Anxiety Symptoms Among Family Members in Brazil: A Path Mediation Analysis in a Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial

Regis Goulart Rosa  1 , José Augusto Santos Pellegrini  2 , Rafael Barberena Moraes  2   3 , Rita Gigliola Gomes Prieb  2 , Daniel Sganzerla  1 , Daniel Schneider  1 , Caroline Cabral Robinson  1 , Renata Kochhann  1 , Daiana Barbosa da Silva  1 , Alexandre Amaral  4 , Rejane Martins Prestes  5 , Gregory Saraiva Medeiros  1 , Maicon Falavigna  1 , Cassiano Teixeira  1   2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Mechanism of a Flexible ICU Visiting Policy for Anxiety Symptoms Among Family Members in Brazil: A Path Mediation Analysis in a Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial

Regis Goulart Rosa et al. Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether the effect of a flexible ICU visiting policy that includes flexible visitation plus visitor education on anxiety symptoms of family members is mediated by satisfaction and involvement in patient care.

Design: We embedded a multivariable path mediation analysis within a cluster-randomized crossover trial as a secondary analysis of The ICU Visits Study (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02932358).

Setting: Thirty-six medical-surgical ICUs in Brazil.

Patients: Closest relatives of adult ICU patients.

Interventions: Flexible visitation (12 hr/d) supported by family education or usual restricted visitation (median, 1.5 hr/d).

Measurements and main results: Overall, 863 family members were assessed (mean age, 44.7 yr; women, 70.1%). Compared with the restricted visitation (n = 436), flexible visitation (n = 427) resulted in better mean anxiety scores (6.1 vs 7.8; mean difference, -1.78 [95% CI, -2.31 to -1.22]), as well as higher standardized scores of satisfaction (67% [95% CI, 55-79]) and involvement in patient care (77% [95% CI, 64-89]). The mediated effect of flexible visitation on mean anxiety scores through each incremental sd of satisfaction and involvement in patient care were -0.47 (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.24) and 0.29 (95% CI, 0.04-0.54), respectively. Upon exploratory analyses, emotional support, helping the ICU staff to understand patient needs, helping the patient to interpret ICU staff instructions, and patient reorientation were the domains of involvement in patient care associated with increased anxiety.

Conclusions: A flexible ICU visiting policy reduces anxiety symptoms among family members and appears to work by increasing satisfaction. However, increased participation in some activities of patient care as a result of flexible visitation was associated with higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Rosa, Sganzerla, Schneider, Robinson, Kochhann, da Silva, Medeiros, and Falavigna report grants from Brazilian Ministry of Health during the conduct of study. Drs. Rosa’s, Sganzerla’s, and Medeiros’s institutions received funding from Brazilian Ministry of Health. Dr. da Silva received funding from Brazilian Ministry of Health. Dr. Amaral’s institution received funding from Hospital Moinhos de Vento. Drs. Amaral, Prestes, and Medeiros disclosed government work. Dr. Prestes’ institution received funding from Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Piauí. Dr. Falavigna received funding from Roche, Novartis, Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ultragenix, PTC Therapeutics, and Sanofi Genzime, and he received support for article research from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Fumis RR, Ranzani OT, Martins PS, et al.: Emotional disorders in pairs of patients and their family members during and after ICU stay. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0115332
    1. Hoffmann M, Jeitziner MM, Riedl R, et al.; ICU-Families Study Group: Psychological symptoms in relatives of critically ill patients (ICU families): A prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:1060–1062
    1. Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, et al.; French FAMIREA Group: Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: Ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:1893–1897
    1. Fumis RR, Deheinzelin D: Family members of critically ill cancer patients: Assessing the symptoms of anxiety and depression. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:899–902
    1. Beesley SJ, Hopkins RO, Holt-Lunstad J, et al.: Acute physiologic stress and subsequent anxiety among family members of ICU patients. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:229–235

Publication types

Associated data