Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:2249:17-34.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_2.

Bias in Clinical Research

Susan Stuckless  1 , Patrick S Parfrey  2
Affiliations

Bias in Clinical Research

Susan Stuckless et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2021.

Abstract

Clinical epidemiological research entails assessing the burden and etiology of disease, the diagnosis and prognosis of disease, the efficacy of preventive measures or treatments, the analysis of the risks and benefits of diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers, and the evaluation of health care services. In all areas, the main focus is to describe the relationship between exposure and outcome and to determine one of the following: prevalence, incidence, cause, prognosis, or effect of treatment. The accuracy of these conclusions is determined by the validity of the study. Validity is determined by addressing potential biases and possible confounders that may be responsible for the observed association. Therefore, it is important to understand the types of bias that exist and also to be able to assess their impact on the magnitude and direction of the observed effect. The following chapter reviews the epidemiological concepts of selection bias, information bias, intervention bias, and confounding and discusses ways in which these sources of bias can be minimized.

Keywords: Confounding; Epidemiology; Information bias; Intervention bias; Selection bias; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Young JM, Solomon MJ (2003) Improving the evidence base in surgery: sources of bias in surgical studies. ANZ J Surg 73:504–506 - DOI
    1. Jepsen P, Johnsen SP, Gillman MW, Sorensen HT (2004) Interpretation of observational studies. Heart 90:956–960 - DOI
    1. Blackmore CC, Cummings P (2004) Observational studies in radiology. AJR 183:1203–1208 - DOI
    1. Barnett ML, Hyman JJ (2006) Challenges in interpreting study results: the conflict between appearance and reality. JADA 137:32S–36S - PubMed
    1. Stuckless S, Parfrey PS, Woods MO, Cox J, Fitzgerald GE, Green JS, Green RC (2007) The phenotypic expression of three MSH2 mutations in large Newfoundland families with Lynch Syndrome. Fam Cancer 6:1–12 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources