Evidence-Based Decision Making 4: Clinical Practice Guidelines
- PMID: 33871858
- DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_24
Evidence-Based Decision Making 4: Clinical Practice Guidelines
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed statements to assist practitioners and patient to reach appropriate health-care decisions. The synthesis and translation of a large amount of evidence into practice recommendations should ultimately reduce the use of unnecessary or harmful interventions, help patients to achieve maximum benefit, and minimize risk, all at an acceptable cost.In the past, CPGs were developed based on expert opinion, and using consensus methodology either formally or informally. Over the last 30 years, the evolution of increasingly transparent and robust methodology has led to more "evidence-based" recommendations. Clinical practice guidelines should be developed within the principles of bias minimization, systematic evidence retrieval and review, and a focus on patient relevant outcomes. Multiple nationally based and international groups now have published specific guidance for the development, dissemination, and evaluation of CPG.This chapter describes the key principles of CPG development, including the importance of updating, disseminating, and evaluating the impact of CPG , and attempts to differentiate CPG intended for populations of patients from "evidence-based decision making" for individual patients, recognizing that the fundamental principles are the same.
Keywords: Benefits:harms; Bias; Clinical practice guidelines; Evaluation; Patient outcomes; Systematic review.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines (1990) Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; [cited 2019 Dec 25]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235751/
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; [cited 2019 Dec 18]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209539/
-
- Kredo T, Bernhardsson S, Machingaidze S et al (2016) Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play. Int J Qual Health Care 28:122–128 - DOI
-
- Uhlig K, Balk EM, Lau J (2008) Grading evidence-based guidelines—what are the issues? Am Kid J Dis 52:211–215 - DOI
-
- Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A (2000) Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 355:103–106 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous