Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:2249:455-466.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_24.

Evidence-Based Decision Making 4: Clinical Practice Guidelines

Affiliations

Evidence-Based Decision Making 4: Clinical Practice Guidelines

Tae Won Yi et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2021.

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed statements to assist practitioners and patient to reach appropriate health-care decisions. The synthesis and translation of a large amount of evidence into practice recommendations should ultimately reduce the use of unnecessary or harmful interventions, help patients to achieve maximum benefit, and minimize risk, all at an acceptable cost.In the past, CPGs were developed based on expert opinion, and using consensus methodology either formally or informally. Over the last 30 years, the evolution of increasingly transparent and robust methodology has led to more "evidence-based" recommendations. Clinical practice guidelines should be developed within the principles of bias minimization, systematic evidence retrieval and review, and a focus on patient relevant outcomes. Multiple nationally based and international groups now have published specific guidance for the development, dissemination, and evaluation of CPG.This chapter describes the key principles of CPG development, including the importance of updating, disseminating, and evaluating the impact of CPG , and attempts to differentiate CPG intended for populations of patients from "evidence-based decision making" for individual patients, recognizing that the fundamental principles are the same.

Keywords: Benefits:harms; Bias; Clinical practice guidelines; Evaluation; Patient outcomes; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines (1990) Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; [cited 2019 Dec 25]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235751/
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; [cited 2019 Dec 18]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209539/
    1. Kredo T, Bernhardsson S, Machingaidze S et al (2016) Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play. Int J Qual Health Care 28:122–128 - DOI
    1. Uhlig K, Balk EM, Lau J (2008) Grading evidence-based guidelines—what are the issues? Am Kid J Dis 52:211–215 - DOI
    1. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A (2000) Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 355:103–106 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources