Cover versions as an impact indicator in popular music: A quantitative network analysis
- PMID: 33872337
- PMCID: PMC8055012
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250212
Cover versions as an impact indicator in popular music: A quantitative network analysis
Abstract
In contemporary popular music, covering or adapting previous songs signals a tribute or reworking of popular hits, which implies acknowledgement of the original musicians. This connection can be interpreted as a form of musical impact among artists. A network graph with more than 106k artists and 855k cover versions extracted from the web site SecondHandSongs was created. The objective is to explore the shape of this network, identify the most relevant artists according to different impact measurements and to visualize connections between music genres. This analysis is done from a longitudinal perspective with the aim of understanding how cover versions can inform us about the history of the contemporary popular music. Results show that the number of covers by artist is skewed distributed, diminishing gradually since the 1950s. Different network metrics have allowed to identify the most covered (weighted indegree), the most influential (PageRank) and the most crossover artists (weighted betweenness centrality). The network graph also shows that genre affinity is the main criterion for covering songs between artists, language being the second. Remakes from other genres reflect that Jazz and Pop/Rock are the most influential because they emerge stronger and form the core of their respective sub-networks. Cover songs describe two cycles. In a first phase from 1900s to 1950s, dominated by Jazz and Vocal artists, the covers are more frequent and associated with the notion of reworking (e.g. jazz standards); in a second stage, since the 1950s, when the Pop/Rock emerges, cover songs are less common and seen as tribute.
Conflict of interest statement
No authors have competing interests.
Figures








Similar articles
-
The representation of epilepsy in popular music.Epilepsy Behav. 2008 Jan;12(1):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.09.012. Epub 2007 Nov 5. Epilepsy Behav. 2008. PMID: 17980673 Review.
-
Trends in Positive, Negative, and Neutral Themes of Popular Music From 1998 to 2018: Observational Study.JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021 Jun 24;4(2):e26475. doi: 10.2196/26475. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021. PMID: 34184999 Free PMC article.
-
Content analysis of tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs in popular music.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Feb;162(2):169-75. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.27. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008. PMID: 18250243 Free PMC article.
-
The sound of music: differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm.Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1432-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.028. Epub 2012 Mar 6. Neuropsychologia. 2012. PMID: 22414595
-
Historical perspectives on music as a cause of disease.Prog Brain Res. 2015;216:127-45. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.017. Epub 2015 Jan 29. Prog Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25684288 Review.
Cited by
-
Population characteristics and self-assessment of speaking and singing voice in Polish contemporary commercial music singers-an exploratory, cross-sectional study.Front Public Health. 2024 May 15;12:1256152. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1256152. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38813421 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shuker R. Understanding popular music culture. 5th edition. London: Routledge; 2016.
-
- Burnett R. The global jukebox: The international music industry. Psychology Press; 1996.
-
- Wall T. Studying popular music culture. London: Sage; 2013.
-
- Borthwick S, Moy R. Popular music genres: An introduction. London: Routledge; 2020.
-
- Schroeder E. Music Databases. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science: Lib-Pub. 2003:1931.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources