Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;30(19-20):3001-3010.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.15808. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

Gamified applications for secondary prevention in patients with high cardiovascular disease risk: A systematic review of effectiveness and acceptability

Affiliations

Gamified applications for secondary prevention in patients with high cardiovascular disease risk: A systematic review of effectiveness and acceptability

Angus J Davis et al. J Clin Nurs. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Gamified health mobile applications (apps) are promoted as innovative approaches to self-management and risk factor reduction. However, information is lacking on effectiveness or feasibility in older patients at high risk for cardiovascular diseases (CVD), which limits uptake and recommendations by nurses. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of gamified apps for CVD secondary prevention.

Methods: EQUATOR PRISMA checklist was used to guide the systematic review. PubMed, Embase and SCOPUS were searched from inception to January 2020 for studies evaluating app interventions incorporating ≥2 game tactics and targeting secondary prevention in patients diagnosed with heart disease, hypertension, stroke or type 2 diabetes. Narrative summaries of results were used as meta-analysis were not possible. The PROSPERO ID number was CRD42020209791.

Results: Seven studies involving 657 patients were included. Gamified apps resulted in more improvement in physical activity, HbA1C and diabetes self-management empowerment compared to multiple different comparators, and more physical activity motivation compared to a neutral content control app. Heart failure knowledge also improved significantly. However, no benefits above usual care were evident for blood pressure or body mass index, or from app use for heart failure self-management, medication adherence or atrial fibrillation knowledge. App acceptability in terms of usage declined with time but was high for the game components of challenges, medication monitoring, viewing of leader boards and badges and walking training participation. Enjoyment was highest for elements that featured surprise/novelty, having teammates, challenges, good graphic design and clarity.

Conclusions: Gamified mobile apps show the potential to improve secondary prevention in high CVD risk patients. Indications for acceptability were evident, with higher adherence than clinic-based secondary prevention programmes. However, further well-designed randomised controlled trials, which track app usage are needed to confirm this potential and encourage nurses to recommend these types of apps.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; game; gamification; mobile applications; nurses; systematic review; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Alberti, K. G. M. M., Eckel, R. H., Grundy, S. M., Zimmet, P. Z., Cleeman, J. I., Donato, K. A., … Blood, I. (2009). Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome. Circulation, 120(16), 1640-1645. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644
    1. Anderson, L., Oldridge, N., Thompson, D. R., Zwisler, A.-D., Rees, K., Martin, N., & Taylor, R. S. (2016). Exercise-Based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 67(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044
    1. Blonde, L., Aschner, P., Bailey, C., Ji, L., Leiter, L. A., & Matthaei, S. (2017). Gaps and barriers in the control of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, 14, 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479164116679775
    1. Buckingham, S., Williams, A., Morrissey, K., Price, L., & Harrison, J. (2019). Mobile health interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: A systematic review. Digital Health, 5, 2055207619839883.
    1. Clark, A. M., Hartling, L., Vandermeer, B., & McAlister, F. A. (2005). Meta-analysis: Secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(9), 659. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-143-9-200511010-00010

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources