The Development of Cognitive Reflection in China
- PMID: 33873237
- DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12966
The Development of Cognitive Reflection in China
Abstract
Cognitive reflection is the tendency to override an intuitive response so as to engage in the reflection necessary to derive a correct response. Here, we examine the emergence of cognitive reflection in a culture that values nonanalytic thinking styles, Chinese culture. We administered a child-friendly version of the cognitive reflection test, the CRT-D, to 130 adults and 111 school-age children in China and compared performance on the CRT-D to several measures of rational thinking (belief bias syllogisms, base rate sensitivity, denominator neglect, and other-side thinking) and normative thinking dispositions (actively open-minded thinking and need for cognition). The CRT-D was a significant predictor of rational thinking and normative thinking dispositions in both children and adults, as previously found in American samples. Adults' performance on the CRT-D correlated with their performance on the original CRT, and children's performance on the CRT-D predicted rational thinking and normative thinking dispositions even after adjusting for age. These results demonstrate that cognitive reflection, rational thinking, and normative thinking dispositions converge even in a culture that emphasizes holistic, nonanalytic reasoning.
Keywords: Cognitive development; Cognitive reflection; Cross-cultural cognition; Rational thought; Thinking dispositions.
© 2021 Cognitive Science Society LLC.
Similar articles
-
Children's Cognitive Reflection Predicts Conceptual Understanding in Science and Mathematics.Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1396-1408. doi: 10.1177/0956797620954449. Epub 2020 Oct 5. Psychol Sci. 2020. PMID: 33017279
-
Rational thinking and cognitive sophistication: development, cognitive abilities, and thinking dispositions.Dev Psychol. 2014 Apr;50(4):1037-48. doi: 10.1037/a0034910. Epub 2013 Nov 4. Dev Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24188038
-
Does the Cognitive Reflection Test actually capture heuristic versus analytic reasoning styles in older adults?Exp Aging Res. 2018 Jan-Feb;44(1):18-34. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2017.1398508. Epub 2017 Nov 22. Exp Aging Res. 2018. PMID: 29166220 Free PMC article.
-
Ways of thinking: from crows to children and back again.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(2):209-41. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.943673. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015. PMID: 25207993 Review.
-
Cognitive styles and religion.Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Aug;40:150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Sep 28. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33130329 Review.
Cited by
-
Is it cognitive effort you measure? Comparing three task paradigms to the Need for Cognition scale.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0290177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290177. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37590223 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2019). The smart system 1: Evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 25, 257-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1507949
-
- Ball, L. J., & Thompson, V. A. (2018). Belief bias and reasoning. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 16-36). New York: Routledge.
-
- Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., & Wang, Y. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323, 586-587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167740
-
- Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Metz, S. E. (2015). Why does the cognitive reflection test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003
-
- Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). Which should you use, intuition or logic? Cultural differences in injunctive norms about reasoning. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.00266.x
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials