Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;45(4):e12966.
doi: 10.1111/cogs.12966.

The Development of Cognitive Reflection in China

Tianwei Gong  1 , Andrew G Young  2 , Andrew Shtulman  3
Affiliations
Free article

The Development of Cognitive Reflection in China

Tianwei Gong et al. Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Cognitive reflection is the tendency to override an intuitive response so as to engage in the reflection necessary to derive a correct response. Here, we examine the emergence of cognitive reflection in a culture that values nonanalytic thinking styles, Chinese culture. We administered a child-friendly version of the cognitive reflection test, the CRT-D, to 130 adults and 111 school-age children in China and compared performance on the CRT-D to several measures of rational thinking (belief bias syllogisms, base rate sensitivity, denominator neglect, and other-side thinking) and normative thinking dispositions (actively open-minded thinking and need for cognition). The CRT-D was a significant predictor of rational thinking and normative thinking dispositions in both children and adults, as previously found in American samples. Adults' performance on the CRT-D correlated with their performance on the original CRT, and children's performance on the CRT-D predicted rational thinking and normative thinking dispositions even after adjusting for age. These results demonstrate that cognitive reflection, rational thinking, and normative thinking dispositions converge even in a culture that emphasizes holistic, nonanalytic reasoning.

Keywords: Cognitive development; Cognitive reflection; Cross-cultural cognition; Rational thought; Thinking dispositions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2019). The smart system 1: Evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 25, 257-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1507949
    1. Ball, L. J., & Thompson, V. A. (2018). Belief bias and reasoning. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 16-36). New York: Routledge.
    1. Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., & Wang, Y. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323, 586-587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167740
    1. Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Metz, S. E. (2015). Why does the cognitive reflection test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003
    1. Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). Which should you use, intuition or logic? Cultural differences in injunctive norms about reasoning. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.00266.x

LinkOut - more resources