Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Sep;155(3):321-348.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x.

The costs of reproduction in plants

Affiliations
Free article
Review

The costs of reproduction in plants

José Ramón Obeso. New Phytol. 2002 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

This review reports on the processes associated with costs of reproduction, including some theoretical considerations, definitions and methodological aspects, followed by a list of the situations where costs are difficult to find. Despite some exceptions, case studies, examined by trade-offs between reproduction and other life-history traits, generally support the predictions of the cost of reproduction hypothesis. The cost of reproduction as an evolutionary determinant of sexual dimorphism in life history traits in dioecious species was specifically tested, considering that the higher cost of reproduction in females has driven the life history traits related to sexual dimorphism. Females of woody dioecious species were consistently smaller than males supporting the costs of reproduction hypothesis. By contrast, females of herbaceous perennials were generally the larger sex, which did not fit the expectations of the hypothesis. Finally, the mechanisms that enable the compensation of the reproductive costs are detailed, including the plastic responses of photosynthesis and growth, the effects of the timing of investment, plant architecture and plant physiological integration. Contents Summary 321 I. Introduction 321 II. Theory on costs of reproduction 322 III. Methodological aspects 324 IV. Empirical evidence 328 V. Plant size and costs of reproduction 330 VI. Costs of reproduction in sexually dimorphic plants 331 VII. Compensation of the costs 333 VIII. Concluding comments and future perspectives 336 Acknowledgements 337 References 337.

Keywords: compensatory growth; demographic costs; dioecy; physiological costs; physiological integration; plant size; somatic costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abouheif E, Fairbairn DJ. 1997. A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: assessing Rensch's rule. American Naturalist 149: 540-562.
    1. Abrahamson WG. 1975. Reproductive strategies in dewberries. Ecology 56: 721-726.
    1. Abrahamson WG. 1980. A comment on vegetative and seed reproduction in plants. Evolution 33: 517-519.
    1. Ackerman JD, Montalvo AM. 1990. Short- and long-term limitation to fruit production in a tropical orchid. Ecology 71: 263-272.
    1. Ågren J. 1987. Intersexual differences in phenology and damage by herbivores and pathogens in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L. Oecologia 72: 161-169.

LinkOut - more resources