Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Mar;157(3):605-615.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00681.x.

Distribution of above-ground and below-ground carbohydrate reserves in adult trees of two contrasting broad-leaved species (Quercus petraea and Fagus sylvatica)

Affiliations
Free article

Distribution of above-ground and below-ground carbohydrate reserves in adult trees of two contrasting broad-leaved species (Quercus petraea and Fagus sylvatica)

C Barbaroux et al. New Phytol. 2003 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

• The exhaustive distribution of total carbohydrate reserves was investigated in oak and beech trees that were approx. 40 yr old and felled at two dates (October 1999 and June 2000) to estimate variations in reserve amounts at the tree level. • The total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) content was highest in the twigs and coarse roots, reaching 10 g 100 g-1 dry matter and 12 g 100 g-1 dry matter for beech and oak twigs, and 13 g 100 g-1 dry matter and 16 g 100 g-1 dry matter for beech and oak roots, respectively. Similar distribution in tree carbohydrates was observed for both species and date, but with contrasting starch/sugar sharing. • Scaling-up to reserve amounts at tree level was performed with extensive organ biomass measurements. Based on the respective biomass of the organs, stem and roots contained the highest quantity of reserves. Between October (before leaf fall) and June (after bud-burst and leaf area index expansion) oaks used double the reserves of beeches. • These differences in the allocation of carbohydrate reserves could arise from differential needs for spring growth and winter maintenance respiration between the two species.

Keywords: Fagus sylvatica (beech); Quercus petraea (sessile oak); carbohydrate reserves; interspecific comparison; reserve utilization; tree scaling.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barbaroux C. 2002. Analyse et modélisation des flux de carbone de peuplements forestiers pour la compréhension de la croissance de deux espèces feuillues Quercus petraea et. Fagus sylvatica. PhD thesis. Paris, France: University of Paris XI.
    1. Barbaroux C, Bréda N. 2002. Contrasting distribution and seasonal dynamics of carbohydrate reserves in stem wood of adult-ring porous sessile oak and diffuse-porous beech trees. Tree Physiology 22: 1201 - 1210. - PubMed
    1. Bartelink HH. 1998. A model of dry matter partitioning in trees. Tree Physiology 18: 91 - 101.
    1. Boehringer SA. 1984. Methods of enzymatic food analysis using single reagents. Mannheim, Germany: Boehringer Mannheim GmbH.
    1. Bollmark L, Sennerby-Forsse L, Ericsson T. 1999. Seasonal dynamics and effects of nitrogen supply rate on nitrogen and carbohydrate reserves in cutting-derived Salix viminalis plants. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 85 - 94.

LinkOut - more resources