Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Oct;160(1):43-48.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00861.x.

On the unreliability of published DNA sequences

Paul D Bridge  1   2   3 , Peter J Roberts  2 , Brian M Spooner  2 , Gita Panchal  1
Affiliations
Free article

On the unreliability of published DNA sequences

Paul D Bridge et al. New Phytol. 2003 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

• Here, the reliability of published fungal nucleic acid sequences is tested by the critical re-evaluation of 206 named sequences obtained from public-access databases. • Sequences from the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene cluster were examined as these are commonly used to establish fungal phylogeny and evolution, and are also increasingly employed in the identification of fungi from nonculture based studies. • Fifty-one rRNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences were obtained for species of Amanita, 55 ITS sequences were obtained for species of Phoma and 100 rRNA small subunit sequences were obtained from representative genera of the order Helotiales. In each case, the fungal group was selected partly on the basis of sequences deposited by three or more laboratories in order to avoid sample bias. The results suggest that up to 20% of the sequences available for each group may be unreliable, and this proportion is supported by additional informal observations.

Keywords: DNA sequences; databases; fungi; reliability; ribosomal RNA; systematics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agerer R, Ammirati J, Blanz P, Courtecuisse R, Desjardin DE, Gams W, Hallenberg N, Halling R, Hawksworth DL, Horak E, Korf RP, Mueller GM, Oberwinkler F, Rambold G, Summerbell RC, Triebel D, Watling R. 2000. Always deposit vouchers. Mycological Research 104: 642-644.
    1. Arenal F, Platas G, Monte E, Pelaez F. 2000. ITS sequencing supports Epicoccum nigrum and Phoma epicoccina being the same biological species. Mycological Research 104: 301-303.
    1. Bainbridge BW. 1994. Modern approaches to the taxonomy of Aspergillus. In: Powell KA, Renwick A, Peberdy JF, eds. The genus Aspergillus, New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press, 291-301.
    1. Blaxter M. 2003. Counting angels with DNA. Nature 421: 122-124. - PubMed
    1. Bridge PD. 2002. The history and application of molecular mycology. Mycologist 16: 90-99.

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources