Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jun;162(3):803-811.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01055.x.

Polyploidy and self-compatibility: is there an association?

Affiliations
Free article

Polyploidy and self-compatibility: is there an association?

Barbara K Mable. New Phytol. 2004 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

• Researchers have hypothesized that self-compatibility (SC) should be more common in polyploid taxa than their diploid counterparts because of selection for reproductive assurance and/or the expected decline in inbreeding depression associated with having 'extra' gene copies. Support for this view has come from an observed breakdown of self-incompatibility (SI) in some species with a gametophytic system (GSI). The purpose of this research was to assess the strength of this relationship across a wider array of SI systems. • A large database, of diploid chromosome numbers, ploidy levels, and types of SI system, was assembled for angiosperm species and used to test for an association between ploidy and SC. • No strong association was found between SC and polyploidy at the level of species or families, and there was no evidence that those having a functional SI system also had fewer polyploid taxa or that most polyploids experience a breakdown in SI. • These results challenge the assumption that self-fertilization is strongly associated with polyploidy and suggest directions for further research on the evolution of polyploidy in relation to SI.

Keywords: angiosperms; association tests; polyploidy; self-incompatibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott RJ, Bretagnolle FC, Thebaud C. 1998. Evolution of a polymorphism for outcrossing rate in Senecio vulgaris: Influence of germination behavior. Evolution 52: 1593-1601.
    1. Atwood SS. 1944. The behaviour of oppositional alleles in polyploids of Trifolium repens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 39: 67-69.
    1. Barrett SCH. 1988. The evolution, maintenance, and loss of self-incompatibility systems. In: J Lovett Doust, L Lovett Doust, eds.Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 98-124.
    1. Bateman AJ. 1952. Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. I. Theory. Heredity 6: 285-310.
    1. Bennett JH. 1976. Expectations for inbreeding depression on self-fertilization of tetraploids. Biometrics 32: 449-452. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources