Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Jan;129(1):135-145.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03017.x.

Variations in habitat, season, flower traits and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta L. (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel

Affiliations
Free article

Variations in habitat, season, flower traits and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta L. (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel

Juan Arroyo et al. New Phytol. 1995 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Narcissus tazetta shows a genetically-based discrete polymorphism for style length similar to that well known in heterostylous plants. Plants are either short- (S) or long-styled (1). In Israel, marsh populations are dominated by S plants and hill populations by L plants. Populations differ in size, flowering time and duration, flower orientation, inflorescence display, vegetative reproduction, and pollinators. The main visitors to flowers in marshes are hawkmoths, whereas in the hills they are visited by short-tongued insects: solitary bees and hoverflies. The pollination efficiency of these insects was investigated by studying foraging behaviour, visit rate, and pollen deposition on stigmas. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis of lower efficiency of pollination of S flowers by short-tongued insects, resulting in the exclusion of this morph from the hills. Additionally, we considered the possibility that there might be pollination ecotypes corresponding to the two habitats (marsh and hill) and examined variation in a set of continuous flower traits related to pollination biology. Flower tube length was the only trait showing a distinct difference between the two habitat types. Although the concentration of nectar was not different between habitats, L flowers presented more concentrated nectar than S flowers. Such a difference in nectar concentration may he of adaptive value for the pollination of the L flowers by short-tongued pollinators in the hills.

Keywords: Ecotypic differentiation; flower polymorphism; heterostyly; nectar; pollination.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

references

    1. Arroyo J, Dafni A. 1993. Interspecific pollen transfer among co-occurring heteromorphic and homomorphic species. Israel Journal of Botany 41: 225-232.
    1. Baker HG, Baker I. 1983. A brief historical review of the chemistry of floral nectar. In: Bentley B, Elias T, eds. The biology of nectaries. New York : Columbia University Press, 126-152.
    1. Barrett SCH, Husband BC. 1990. The genetics of plant migration and colonization. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS, eds. Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sunderland : Sinauer Associated Inc., 254-277.
    1. Barrett SCH, Lloyd DG, Arroyo J. In Press. Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In: Barrett SCH, Lloyd DG, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York : Chapman & Hall.
    1. Beach JH, Bawa KS. 1980. The role of pollinators in the evolution of distyly into dioecy. Evolution 34: 1138-1143.

LinkOut - more resources