Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 30:37:1-7.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.501120-20201018-00441. Online ahead of print.

[A prospective randomized controlled study on the effect of balance training on lower limb movement and balance dysfunction in severe burn patients]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations

[A prospective randomized controlled study on the effect of balance training on lower limb movement and balance dysfunction in severe burn patients]

[Article in Chinese]
T F Ru et al. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To observe the rehabilitation effect of balance training on motor and balance function of lower extremities of deep burn patients. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. From January 2016 to January 2020, sixty-four patients with lower limb motor and balance dysfunction after deep burn were admitted to Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University&Wuhan Third Hospital, the burn area was 30% to 70% Total Body Surface Area, and the burn depth of more than one hip, knee and ankle joint of both lower limbs and their periphery were deep second or third degree. According to the method of random number table, the patients were divided into routine training(RT) group and balance training(BT) group. There were 32 cases in each group, 22 males and 10 females in the RT group, aged 40.5 (35.5, 52.8) years old, and 24 males and 8 females in the BT group, aged 37.0 (30.0, 44.0) years old. Patients in group RT were conventionally conducted with knee joint stretch treatment, continuous passive motion treatment, lower limb muscle strength training and pressure therapy; while patients in group BT were conducted with balance training besides RT such as sitting balance, center of gravity transfer, pelvic stability, standing alternately on one leg and standing on balance pad. Patients in the 2 groups were treated for 4 months. Before treatment and after 4 months of treatment,Berg balance score, lower limb function score and balance activity self-confidence score were evaluated . The data were statistically analyzed with t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test or χ² test. Results: (1) Before treatment, the difference value of Berg balance score of patients in group RT was (25±9), which was similar to (25±7) in group BT(t=-0.154,P>0.05). After 4 months of treatment, the difference value of Berg balance score of patients in group BT was (43±6), which was higher than (40±6) in group RT (t=2.028,P<0.05). The difference values of Berg balance scores of the patients in group RT and BT after 4 months of treatment were obviously higher than those before treatment(t=-15.189,-26.2,P<0.001). (2) Before treatment, the lower limb function score of patients in group RT was 25.0 (16.5,30.0), which was similar to 23.0(10.3,28.8) in group BT(Z=-1.575,P>0.05). After 4 months of treatment, the lower limb function score of patients in group BT was 55.0(35.0, 60.0) , which was significantly higher than 43.0 (36.0, 53.0) in group RT(Z=-2.744,P<0.01). The lower limb function scale of patients in group RT and BT after 4 months of treatment were obviously higher than those before treatment(Z=-4.943,-4.955,P<0.01). (3) Before treatment, the balance activity self-confidence scores of the two groups were similar(t=-0.966,P>0.05) . After 4 months of treatment , the balance activity self-confidence scores of patients in group ST was significantly higher than that in group RT (t=3.343,P<0.01). The balance activity self-confidence scores of patients in groups RT and BT after 4 months of treatment were obviously higher than those before treatment(t=-19.611,-34.300,P<0.001). Conclusions: The balance training can effectively promote the recovery of lower limb motor and balance function on the basis of conventional rehabilitation treatment for patients with lower limb motor and balance dysfunction after deep burns.

目的: 观察平衡训练对严重烧伤患者下肢运动及平衡功能的康复治疗效果。 方法: 采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法。2016年1月—2020年1月,武汉大学同仁医院暨武汉市第三医院收治下肢运动及平衡功能障碍的严重烧伤患者64例,烧伤面积30%~70% 体表总面积,双下肢髋、膝、踝关节一个以上及其周边烧伤深度为深Ⅱ或Ⅲ度。采用随机数字表法将患者分为常规组和平衡训练组,每组各32例,常规组男22例、女10例,年龄40.5(35.5,52.8)岁;平衡训练组男24例、女8例, 年龄37.0(30.0,44.0)岁。常规组进行膝关节牵伸、持续被动运动、下肢肌力训练以及压力治疗;平衡训练组在常规治疗基础上辅以坐位平衡、重心转移、骨盆稳定性、单腿站立交替和平衡垫站立等平衡训练,2组患者均治疗4个月。于治疗前和治疗4个月后分别进行Berg平衡评分、下肢功能评分、平衡活动自信心评分,对数据行t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验或χ²检验。 结果: (1)治疗前,常规组及平衡训练组患者Berg平衡评分分别为(25±9)、(25±7)分,2组评分相近(t=-0.154, P>0.05);治疗4个月后,平衡训练组患者Berg平衡评分(43±6)分高于常规组(40±6)分(t=2.028,P<0.05);常规组、平衡训练组患者治疗4个月后Berg平衡评分均明显大于治疗前(t=-15.189,-26.2,P<0.01)。(2)治疗前,常规组及平衡训练组患者下肢功能评分分别为25.0(16.5,30.0)、23.0(10.3,28.8)分(Z=-1.575,P>0.05);治疗4个月后,平衡训练组患者下肢功能评分为55.0(35.0,60.0)分,明显高于常规组的43.0(36.0,53.0)分(Z=-2.744,P<0.01)。常规组、平衡训练组患者治疗4个月后下肢功能评分均显著高于治疗前(Z=-4.943,-4.955,P<0.01)。(3)治疗前,2组患者平衡活动自信心评分相近(t=-0.966,P>0.05);治疗4个月后,平衡训练组患者平衡活动自信心评分明显高于常规组(t=3.343,P<0.01)。常规组、平衡训练组患者治疗4个月后平衡活动自信心评分均明显高于治疗前(t=-19.611,-34.300,P<0.01)。 结论: 严重烧伤后下肢运动及平衡功能障碍患者常规治疗联合平衡训练能明显促进下肢运动及平衡功能恢复。.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources