Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK
- PMID: 33874913
- PMCID: PMC8054234
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03781-x
Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK
Abstract
Background: Induction of labour (IOL) is one of the most commonly performed interventions in maternity care, with outpatient cervical ripening increasingly offered as an option for women undergoing IOL. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the context of practice and the option of returning home for cervical ripening may now assume greater significance. This work aimed to examine whether and how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed practice around IOL in the UK.
Method: We used an online questionnaire to survey senior obstetricians and midwives at all 156 UK NHS Trusts and Boards that currently offer maternity services. Responses were analysed to produce descriptive statistics, with free text responses analysed using a conventional content analysis approach.
Findings: Responses were received from 92 of 156 UK Trusts and Boards, a 59% response rate. Many Trusts and Boards reported no change to their IOL practice, however 23% reported change in methods used for cervical ripening; 28% a change in criteria for home cervical ripening; 28% stated that more women were returning home during cervical ripening; and 24% noted changes to women's response to recommendations for IOL. Much of the change was reported as happening in response to attempts to minimise hospital attendance and restrictions on birth partners accompanying women.
Conclusions: The pandemic has changed practice around induction of labour, although this varied significantly between NHS Trusts and Boards. There is a lack of formal evidence to support decision-making around outpatient cervical ripening: the basis on which changes were implemented and what evidence was used to inform decisions is not clear.
Keywords: COVID-19; Cervical ripening; Choice; Induction of labour.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cervical ripening at home or in hospital during induction of labour: the CHOICE prospective cohort study, process evaluation and economic analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec;28(81):1-142. doi: 10.3310/LPYT7894. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39707888 Free PMC article.
-
Women and birth partners' experiences of cervical ripening at home and in hospital.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06936-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 39885412 Free PMC article.
-
Outpatient induction of labour in the UK: a survey of practice.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Sep;204:21-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jul 30. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27513897
-
Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review.BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 29211328
-
Membrane sweeping at term to promote spontaneous labour and reduce the likelihood of a formal induction of labour for postmaturity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jan;39(1):54-62. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1467388. Epub 2018 Oct 4. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019. PMID: 30284490
Cited by
-
Comparison of Modified Labor Induction Strategies for Pregnant Women at a Single Tertiary Center Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;14(23):2739. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232739. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39682647 Free PMC article.
-
Induction of labour care in the UK: A cross-sectional survey of maternity units.PLoS One. 2024 Feb 28;19(2):e0297857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297857. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38416750 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of COVID-19 on access to and delivery of sexual and reproductive healthcare services in countries with universal healthcare systems: A systematic review.PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0294744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294744. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38394146 Free PMC article.
-
Pre and Post-Lockdown Cesarean Deliveries and Perinatal Quality Indicators During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Dela J Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;8(3):108-112. doi: 10.32481/djph.2022.08.018. eCollection 2022 Aug. Dela J Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36177166 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing safe and personalised maternity and neonatal care through a pandemic: a case study of outcomes and experiences in two trusts in England using the ASPIRE COVID-19 framework.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 22;23(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09669-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37349751 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Public Health Scotland. Births in Scottish hospitals - year ending 31 March 2020. Edinburgh: National Statistics.
-
- NHS Digital. NHS maternity statistics, England 2019-20. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre.
-
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) NICE guideline CG70 - induction of labour. London: RCOG Press; 2008. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical