Free Graft Augmentation Urethroplasty for Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Which Technique Is Best? A Systematic Review
- PMID: 33875306
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.026
Free Graft Augmentation Urethroplasty for Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Which Technique Is Best? A Systematic Review
Abstract
Context: Four techniques for graft placement in one-stage bulbar urethroplasty have been reported: dorsal onlay (DO), ventral onlay (VO), dorsolateral onlay (DLO), and dorsal inlay (DI). There is currently no systematic review in the literature comparing these techniques.
Objective: To assess if stricture recurrence and secondary outcomes vary between the four techniques and to assess if one technique is superior to any other.
Evidence acquisition: The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane HTA, DARE, HEED) databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for publications in English from 1996 onwards. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), observational studies (cohort, case-control/comparative, single-arm), and case series with ≥20 adult male participants were included.
Evidence synthesis: A total of 41 studies were included involving 3683 patients from one RCT, four NRCSs, and 36 case series. Owing to the overall low quality of the evidence, a narrative synthesis was performed.
Conclusions: No single technique appears to be superior to another for bulbar free graft urethroplasty. Both DO and VO are suitable for bulbar augmentation urethroplasty, with a ≤20% recurrence rate over medium-term follow-up. No recommendations can be made regarding DI or DLO techniques owing to the paucity of evidence. Secondary outcomes including sexual function, and complications are infrequently reported. Recurrence rates deteriorate in the long term for both DO and VO procedures.
Patient summary: We reviewed the evidence for four different skin-graft techniques used to repair narrowing of a section of the urethra (bulbar urethra, under the scrotum and perineum) in men. Two of the techniques seem to give consistent results, with recurrence rates lower than 20%. Recurrence rates increase over time, so patients should continue to monitor their symptoms. There is poorer reporting of other outcomes such as sexual function, urinary symptoms, and complications, and it is possible that these occur more frequently than the current data suggest.
Keywords: Bulbar urethral stricture; Dorsal onlay; Free graft augmentation urethroplasty; Graft placement; Ventral onlay.
Copyright © 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Bulbar Urethroplasty: What Lessons Have We Learned?Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):69-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 Apr 30. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33941404 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Double inlay plus ventral onlay buccal mucosa graft for simultaneous penile and bulbar urethral stricture.Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Jul-Aug;44(4):838-839. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0067. Int Braz J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29135409 Free PMC article.
-
Buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture repair: evaluation of the impact of stricture location and lichen sclerosus on surgical outcome.J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):2011-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.034. Epub 2007 Sep 17. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17869301
-
Ventral oral mucosal onlay graft urethroplasty in nontraumatic bulbar urethral strictures: surgical technique and multivariable analysis of results in 214 patients.Eur Urol. 2013 Sep;64(3):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.046. Epub 2013 Jun 5. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23759258
-
Surgical techniques in substitution urethroplasty using buccal mucosa for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures.Eur Urol. 2008 Jun;53(6):1162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.10.011. Eur Urol. 2008. PMID: 18609764 Review.
-
Dorsal- vs ventral-onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for urethral strictures: a meta-analysis.BJU Int. 2025 Sep;136(3):385-394. doi: 10.1111/bju.16811. Epub 2025 Jun 8. BJU Int. 2025. PMID: 40484913 Review.
Cited by
-
Retrospective analysis of urethral anastomosis with ancillary maneuvers and intraoperative biaxial defect measurements to achieve a tension free guidance system for redo PFUDD treatment.BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 9;24(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01456-1. BMC Urol. 2024. PMID: 38594657 Free PMC article.
-
Study on clinical outcomes between non-transecting urethroplasty and lingual mucosal urethroplasty for iatrogenic bulbar urethral stricture treatment.Basic Clin Androl. 2023 May 4;33(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12610-023-00185-z. Basic Clin Androl. 2023. PMID: 37138233 Free PMC article.
-
A double-layer PLGA/CoI-MeHA tissue engineering scaffold for urethral reconstruction.Front Pharmacol. 2025 Feb 17;16:1555183. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1555183. eCollection 2025. Front Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 40034824 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the urethral stricture score and patient-related factors as predictors of outcomes following oral mucosal graft urethroplasty.Asian J Urol. 2024 Jul;11(3):473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Jul 25. Asian J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39139526 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution and innovation in urethroplasty: a comprehensive narrative review of graft types and surgical techniques.Int J Impot Res. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01040-7. Online ahead of print. Int J Impot Res. 2025. PMID: 40108338 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources