Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 29;71(706):e364-e371.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X714137. Print 2021 May.

Predicting the risk of prostate cancer in asymptomatic men: a cohort study to develop and validate a novel algorithm

Affiliations

Predicting the risk of prostate cancer in asymptomatic men: a cohort study to develop and validate a novel algorithm

Julia Hippisley-Cox et al. Br J Gen Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of prostate cancer at an early stage can potentially identify tumours when intervention may improve treatment options and survival.

Aim: To develop and validate an equation to predict absolute risk of prostate cancer in asymptomatic men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests in primary care.

Design and setting: Cohort study using data from English general practices, held in the QResearch database.

Method: Routine data were collected from 1098 QResearch English general practices linked to mortality, hospital, and cancer records for model development. Two separate sets of practices were used for validation. In total, there were 844 455 men aged 25-84 years with PSA tests recorded who were free of prostate cancer at baseline in the derivation cohort; the validation cohorts comprised 292 084 and 316 583 men. The primary outcome was incident prostate cancer. Cox proportional hazards models were used to derive 10-year risk equations. Measures of performance were determined in both validation cohorts.

Results: There were 40 821 incident cases of prostate cancer in the derivation cohort. The risk equation included PSA level, age, deprivation, ethnicity, smoking status, serious mental illness, diabetes, BMI, and family history of prostate cancer. The risk equation explained 70.4% (95% CI = 69.2 to 71.6) of the variation in time to diagnosis of prostate cancer (R2) (D statistic 3.15, 95% CI = 3.06 to 3.25; Harrell's C-index 0.917, 95% CI = 0.915 to 0.919). Two-step approach had higher sensitivity than a fixed PSA threshold at identifying prostate cancer cases (identifying 68.2% versus 43.9% of cases), high-grade cancers (49.2% versus 40.3%), and deaths (67.0% versus 31.5%).

Conclusion: The risk equation provided valid measures of absolute risk and had higher sensitivity for incident prostate cancer, high-grade cancers, and prostate cancer mortality than a simple approach based on age and PSA threshold.

Keywords: cohort studies; primary health care; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; risk prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Comparison of two strategies for identifying men at high risk of prostate cancer using the QResearch validation cohort. PSA = prostate specific antigen.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient selection process for QResearch derivation, QResearch validation, and CPRD GOLD validation cohorts. CPRD GOLD = Clinical Practice Research Datalink Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. PSA = prostate specific antigen.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–E386. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence Prostate cancer: clinical knowledge summary. 2017 https://cks.nice.org.uk/prostate-cancer#!diagnosissub:2 (accessed 4 Mar 2021).
    1. Ilic D, Djulbegovic M, Jung JH, et al. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;362:k3519. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014;384(9959):2027–2035. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin RM, Donovan JL, Turner EL, et al. Effect of a low-intensity PSA-based screening intervention on prostate cancer mortality: the CAP randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(9):883–895. - PMC - PubMed

Substances