Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jul;44(7):1595-1603.
doi: 10.2337/dc20-2878. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100

Ildiko Lingvay et al. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Insulin icodec is a novel once-weekly basal insulin analog. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of icodec using different once-weekly titration algorithms.

Research design and methods: This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label, 16-week, treat-to-target study. Insulin-naive adults (n = 205) with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c 7-10% while treated with oral glucose-lowering medications initiated once-weekly icodec titrations A (prebreakfast self-measured blood glucose target 80-130 mg/dL; adjustment ±21 units/week; n = 51), B (80-130 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 51), or C (70-108 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 52), or once-daily insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) (80-130 mg/dL; ±4 units/day; n = 51), all titrated weekly. Percentage of time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) during weeks 15 and 16 was measured using continuous glucose monitoring.

Results: TIR improved from baseline (means: A, 57.0%; B, 55.2%; C, 51.0%; IGlar U100, 55.3%) to weeks 15 and 16 (estimated mean: A, 76.6%; B, 83.0%; C, 80.9%; IGlar U100, 75.9%). TIR was greater for titration B than for IGlar U100 (estimated treatment difference 7.08%-points; 95% CI 2.12 to 12.04; P = 0.005). No unexpected safety signals were observed. Level 2 hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was low in all groups (0.05, 0.15, 0.38, 0.00 events per patient-year of exposure for icodec titrations A, B, and C and IGlar U100, respectively), with no episodes of severe hypoglycemia.

Conclusions: Once-weekly icodec was efficacious and well tolerated across all three titration algorithms investigated. The results for icodec titration A (80-130 mg/dL; ±21 units/week) displayed the best balance between glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03951805.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TIR 3.9–10.0 mmol/L (70–180 mg/dL) at baseline and during the last 2 weeks of treatment (weeks 15 and 16) (FAS, N = 205). Baseline values are observed mean values. End-of-treatment values represent estimated mean values. The numbers of patients who had missing or <70% CGM measurements during the last 2 weeks of treatment (weeks 15 and 16) were two for titration A, one for titration B, two for titration C, and one for IGlar U100. Insulin icodec titration A: titration of insulin icodec to a prebreakfast SMBG target of 4.4–7.2 mmol/L (80–130 mg/dL) with dose adjustment of ±21 units. Insulin icodec titration B: titration of insulin icodec to a prebreakfast SMBG target of 4.4–7.2 mmol/L (80–130 mg/dL) with dose adjustment of ±28 units. Insulin icodec titration C: titration of insulin icodec to a prebreakfast SMBG target of 3.9–6.0 mmol/L (70–108 mg/dL) with dose adjustment of ±28 units. IGlar U100: titration of IGlar U100 to a prebreakfast SMBG target of 4.4–7.2 mmol/L (80–130 mg/dL) with dose adjustment of ±4 units. TAR, time above range; TBR, time below range.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in key parameters during the 16-weeks study (FAS, N = 205). Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 16 (A), mean weekly insulin dose over time (B), and mean cumulative function of number of severe (level 3) and clinically significant (level 2) hypoglycemic events when subjects were on treatment (C). Observed data: mean (symbol) ± SEM (A) and geometric mean (symbol) ± SEM on log-scale backtransformed (B). Insulin icodec titration A: titration of insulin icodec to a prebreakfast SMBG target of 4.4–7.2 mmol/L (80–130 mg/dL) with dose adjustment of ±21 units. Insulin icodec titration B: titration of insulin icodec to a prebreakfast SMBG target of 4.4–7.2 mmol/L (80–130 mg/dL) with dose adjustment of ±28 units. Insulin icodec titration C: titration of insulin icodec to a prebreakfast SMBG target of 3.9–6.0 mmol/L (70–108 mg/dL) with dose adjustment of ±28 units. IGlar U100: titration of IGlar U100 to a prebreakfast SMBG target of 4.4–7.2 mmol/L (80–130 mg/dL) with dose adjustment of ±4 units. U, units. *Estimated mean values and the corresponding CIs at week 16 derived based on multiple imputation.

Comment in

  • Weekly Insulin Becoming a Reality.
    Skyler JS. Skyler JS. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul;44(7):1459-1461. doi: 10.2337/dci21-0011. Epub 2021 Jun 21. Diabetes Care. 2021. PMID: 34155035 No abstract available.

References

    1. Perez-Nieves M, Boye KS, Kiljanski J, Cao D, Lage MJ. Adherence to basal insulin therapy among people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of costs and patient outcomes. Diabetes Ther 2018;9:1099–1111 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al. .; International DAWN Advisory Panel . Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care 2005;28:2673–2679 - PubMed
    1. Polonsky WH, Henry RR. Poor medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: recognizing the scope of the problem and its key contributors. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016;10:1299–1307 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarbacker GB, Urteaga EM. Adherence to insulin therapy. Diabetes Spectr 2016;29:166–170 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yehl K. AADE practice paper in brief: diabetes educators play a critical role in successful insulin management. AADE Pract 2018;6:36–37

Publication types