Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 19;12(1):2310.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22378-8.

Non-structural carbohydrates mediate seasonal water stress across Amazon forests

Affiliations

Non-structural carbohydrates mediate seasonal water stress across Amazon forests

Caroline Signori-Müller et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) are major substrates for plant metabolism and have been implicated in mediating drought-induced tree mortality. Despite their significance, NSC dynamics in tropical forests remain little studied. We present leaf and branch NSC data for 82 Amazon canopy tree species in six sites spanning a broad precipitation gradient. During the wet season, total NSC (NSCT) concentrations in both organs were remarkably similar across communities. However, NSCT and its soluble sugar (SS) and starch components varied much more across sites during the dry season. Notably, the proportion of leaf NSCT in the form of SS (SS:NSCT) increased greatly in the dry season in almost all species in the driest sites, implying an important role of SS in mediating water stress in these sites. This adjustment of leaf NSC balance was not observed in tree species less-adapted to water deficit, even under exceptionally dry conditions. Thus, leaf carbon metabolism may help to explain floristic sorting across water availability gradients in Amazonia and enable better prediction of forest responses to future climate change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Location of sampled sites and monthly precipitation.
The map depicts mean annual precipitation in South America (mm year−1). The Amazon basin is bounded by the black outline. Bar plots show the monthly precipitation for each site, blue represents precipitation >100 mm month−1 and red ≤100 mm month−1. Data for the map and bar plots are from WorldClim v2 (1970–2010, 30 s resolution).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Species-mean total NSC (NSCT) and variance partitioning into site and taxonomic components.
Concentrations of NSCT and variance partitioning results are displayed separately for leaves (panels ad) and branches (panels eh) during the wet and dry seasons. Left hand panels: Each box encompasses the 25th to 75th percentiles; the median is indicated by the horizontal line with each box while external horizontal lines indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles; dots indicate outliers. Sites are ordered and colour-coded from left to right from driest to wettest; red to yellow boxes represent the seasonal sites and two blue boxes the aseasonal sites; n indicates the number of species sampled in each site. Differences among sites were tested using Kruskal–Wallis. Sites with different letters are statistically distinguishable (p < 0.05, post hoc Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon Rank Sum test using Bonferroni correction is indicated by small letters). Right hand panels: Partitioning of total variance of NSCT, starch and soluble sugars into genetic (family/genus/species), environmental (site) and error (residual) components; for the variance partitioning analysis, values were log1p-transformed prior to analysis.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Seasonal variation of total NSC (NSCT), starch and soluble sugars (SS) across Amazon forests.
Sites are ordered from left to right, from driest to wettest site. Panels a, c and e represent leaves and panels b, d and f represent branches. Red boxes denote the dry season and blue boxes denote the wet season. Each box encompasses the 25th to 75th percentiles; the median is indicated by the horizontal line with each box while external horizontal lines indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles; dots indicate outliers. Number of species sampled in each site are the same in the dry and wet season and are as follows: Ken = 9, Fec = 14, Man = 13, Tam = 21. To test for differences between season within site we used paired sample Wilcoxon tests.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Relationship between leaf NSC and water status, and distributions of species-level seasonal shifts in leaf NSC allocation.
Relationship between a leaf SS:NSCT (proportion of leaf NSCT in the form of soluble sugars) and midday leaf water potential (ΨMD); c leaf starch and ΨMD. Distributions of species-level seasonal shifts in b leaf SS:NSCT allocation (SS:NSCT Wet − SS:NSCT Dry) and d starch allocation (starch wet − starch dry). In the panel a and c the SS:NSCT, starch and ΨMD represent mean of all species sampled in each site in the dry season, except in the two sites where there is no dry season (monthly precipitation ≤ 100 mm month−1). Vertical and horizontal bars denote one standard error of the mean. The relationship between SS:NSCT, starch and ΨMD was fitted using standardised major axis (SMA) regression. In the panel b and d sites are ordered from top to bottom from drier to wettest. Long vertical black line denotate the mean ΔSS:NSCT and starch, each dot represents one species. Values to the left of the blue line denote species that increased SS:NSCT and starch in the dry season while those to the right of the line increased SS:NSCT and starch in the wet season.

References

    1. Martínez-Vilalta J, et al. Dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in terrestrial plants: A global synthesis. Ecol. Monogr. 2016;86:495–516. doi: 10.1002/ecm.1231. - DOI
    1. Hartmann H, Trumbore S. Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees–from what we can measure to what we want to know. N. Phytol. 2016;211:386–403. doi: 10.1111/nph.13955. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richardson AD, et al. Seasonal dynamics and age of stemwood nonstructural carbohydrates in temperate forest trees. N. Phytol. 2013;197:850–861. doi: 10.1111/nph.12042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doughty CE, et al. Source and sink carbon dynamics and carbon allocation in the Amazon basin. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles. 2015;29:645–655. doi: 10.1002/2014GB005028. - DOI
    1. Mcdowell N, et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? N. Phytol. 2008;178:719–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources