Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco
- PMID: 33876214
- PMCID: PMC8083207
- DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxab018
Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco
Abstract
Objectives: Health care workers (HCWs) adopted several protective measures, including hand hygiene and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the frequent use of these preventive measures can lead to skin reactions. Our study aimed to determine the frequency of these reactions in Northern Morocco. In addition, we also looked at the risk factors and the consequences of these injuries on work efficiency and performance.
Materials and methods: An anonymous online survey was used to collect data, which was sent to 500 health workers in the study region. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data on IBM SPSS software.
Results: In total, 273/500 responded to the questionnaire (55%). For the participants' profession, 41% were doctors, 32% were nursing staff, and 26% held other jobs. The general prevalence rate of adverse reactions for all health workers was (80%), including skin problems: after wearing goggles (58%), after wearing surgical masks and respirators (57%), after handwashing and wearing gloves (45%), after wearing a face shield (23%), and after wearing protective clothing (11%). Bleach immersion was highly significantly associated with hand reaction (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.77-4.90; P < 0.001). Moreover, we found a statistically significant association between hand cream use more than twice daily and fewer reactions (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.98-3.77; P = 0.038). The skin reactions related to goggles use were also significantly associated with use duration (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.988-3.12; P = 0.05). Similarly, wearing masks and N95 respirators and their related adverse reactions were significantly associated with use duration (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.20-0.7; P = 0.02). In addition, adverse reactions of regular use of protective clothing were related to the frequency of its use per shift (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.47-8.54; P = 0.05).
Conclusions: Our survey-based study showed that the prevalence of these skin reactions in our context should not be neglected. The length of daily wearing time and the frequency of PPE uses were the most implicated factors. More attention must be paid to these reactions for better care of HCWs during these critical times.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; adverse skin reactions; eye protection; hand hygiene; healthcare workers; medical mask; personal protective equipment; respiratory protection.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
Similar articles
-
The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20603. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020603. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32541493 Free PMC article.
-
Skin-related problems associated with the use of personal protective equipment among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A online survey study.J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 8. J Tissue Viability. 2022. PMID: 35027251 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and Disinfectants on Skin Health During Covid 19 Pandemia.Med Arch. 2021 Oct;75(5):361-365. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.361-365. Med Arch. 2021. PMID: 35169358 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022 Dec;4:100280. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100280. Epub 2022 Jun 13. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022. PMID: 35722539 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative efficacy of respiratory personal protective equipment against viral respiratory infectious diseases in healthcare workers: a network meta-analysis.Public Health. 2021 Jan;190:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 23. Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33360295 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Clinico Epidemiological Study of Adverse Cutaneous Manifestations on Using Personal Protective Equipment Among Health Care Workers During Covid Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Centre.Indian J Dermatol. 2022 Jul-Aug;67(4):478. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_1157_20. Indian J Dermatol. 2022. PMID: 36578707 Free PMC article.
-
Adverse Effects Faced by Healthcare Workers While Using Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad.Cureus. 2023 May 3;15(5):e38485. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38485. eCollection 2023 May. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37273298 Free PMC article.
-
Facial dermatoses induced by face masks: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Dec;87(6):473-484. doi: 10.1111/cod.14203. Epub 2022 Sep 2. Contact Dermatitis. 2022. PMID: 35980367 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and associated factors of COVID-19 among Moroccan physicians: A cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0277157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277157. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36322588 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of infection prevention measures on the occurrence of cutaneous lesions and the quality of life of frontline and non-frontline healthcare workers: A multicentre cross-sectional study.J Infect Prev. 2025 Mar 4:17571774251324382. doi: 10.1177/17571774251324382. Online ahead of print. J Infect Prev. 2025. PMID: 40051734 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Demirtaş H, Bayraktar D, Aksoy A (2020) Assessment of the experience and mood of COVID-19 pandemic care nurses, NATURENGS MTU J Eng Natural Sci; (Special Issue): 19–27.
-
- Foddai AC, Grant IR, Dean M. (2016) Efficacy of instant hand sanitizers against foodborne pathogens compared with hand washing with soap and water in food preparation settings: a systematic review. J Food Prot; 79: 1040–54. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous