Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 13;118(15):e1912436117.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912436117.

(Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world

Emily L Howell  1 , Dominique Brossard  2   3
Affiliations
Review

(Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world

Emily L Howell et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Science literacy is often held up as crucial for avoiding science-related misinformation and enabling more informed individual and collective decision-making. But research has not yet examined whether science literacy actually enables this, nor what skills it would need to encompass to do so. In this report, we address three questions to outline what it should mean to be science literate in today's world: 1) How should we conceptualize science literacy? 2) How can we achieve this science literacy? and 3) What can we expect science literacy's most important outcomes to be? If science literacy is to truly enable people to become and stay informed (and avoid being misinformed) on complex science issues, it requires skills that span the "lifecycle" of science information. This includes how the scientific community produces science information, how media repackage and share the information, and how individuals encounter and form opinions on this information. Science literacy, then, is best conceptualized as encompassing three dimensions of literacy spanning the lifecycle: Civic science literacy, digital media science literacy, and cognitive science literacy. Achieving such science literacy, particularly for adults, poses many challenges and will likely require a structural perspective. Digital divides, in particular, are a major structural barrier, and community literacy and building science literacy into media and science communication are promising opportunities. We end with a discussion of what some of the beneficial outcomes could be-and, as importantly, will likely not be-of science literacy that furthers informed and critical engagement with science in democratic society.

Keywords: digital literacy; misinformation; science communication; science knowledge; science literacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A representation of the dimensions of literacy necessary for science literacy, across the schematic lifecycle of science information in society.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine , Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2016). - PubMed
    1. Hilgartner S., The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Soc. Stud. Sci. 20, 519–539 (1990).
    1. Miller J. D., The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Underst. Sci. 7, 203–223 (1998).
    1. Laugksch R. C., Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Sci. Educ. 84, 71–94 (2000).
    1. Brossard D., Shanahan J., Do they know what they read? Building a scientific literacy measurement instrument based on science media coverage. Sci. Commun. 28, 47–63 (2006).

LinkOut - more resources