Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;32(7):1963-1969.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04781-3. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Are there adverse outcomes for child health and development following caesarean section delivery? Can we justify using elective caesarean section to prevent obstetric pelvic floor damage?

Jennifer King  1
Affiliations
Review

Are there adverse outcomes for child health and development following caesarean section delivery? Can we justify using elective caesarean section to prevent obstetric pelvic floor damage?

Jennifer King. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Elective pre-labour Caesarean section (CS) delivery is widely regarded as the panacea for all pelvic floor dysfunction despite substantial epidemiological evidence that it is only partially protective. To demand a CS is also considered a right for the well-counselled patient, even without an elevated risk of incontinence or prolapse. In recent years there has been increasing data on possible adverse health outcomes for children delivered by CS over those delivered vaginally. This includes respiratory illness, atopic conditions, obesity, diabetes and other severe auto-immune diseases. Concern has also been raised over possible impacts on cognitive and neuropsychological development in these children. Often the response has been to dismiss these outcomes as a result of the indication for the CS birth such as antenatal compromise or maternal disease. However the marked increase in non-medical Caesarean delivery throughout many regions of the world has allowed us to better distinguish these contributing factors.

Methods: This narrative review looks at some of the more recent evidence on adverse health and developmental outcomes associated with CS, particularly pre-labour CS and the implications for the long term health of our society.

Results: Epidemiological studies and animal research indicate an increased risk of negative impacts on child physical health and neuro-cognitive development aftercaesarean section delivery, particularly pre-labour Caesarean section, compared with vaginal delivery. This elevated risk persists after correction forobstetric and maternal factors.

Conclusion: Caesarean section delivery can result in adverse outcomes for infant, maternal and societal wellbeing. Elective Caesarean section, purely to potentially minimise pelvic floor dysfunction, cannot be justified.

Keywords: Childhood illness; Cognitive impairment; Elective caesarean section; Pelvic floor dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rortveit G, Daltveit A, Hannestad Y, et al. Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or caesarean section. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(10):900–7. - PubMed
    1. Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2013;120(2):152–60. - PubMed
    1. Tahtinen R, Cartwright R, Vernooij R, et al. Long-term risks of stress and urgency urinary incontinence after different vaginal delivery modes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(2):181.e1–8.
    1. Urbankova I, Grohregin K, Hanacek J, et al. The effect of the first vaginal birth on pelvic floor anatomy and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(10):1689–96. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Schei B, Johanessen H, Rydning A, et al. Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery or caesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(1):51–60. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources