Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;278(11):4535-4543.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06816-3. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Influence of travel burden on tumor classification and survival of head and neck cancer patients

Affiliations

Influence of travel burden on tumor classification and survival of head and neck cancer patients

J M Vahl et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer patients have to overcome various barriers to obtain diagnostics and treatment at head and neck cancer centers. Travel distance to a specialized hospital may result in psychosocial and financial distress, thus interfering with diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up care. In this study, we have aimed to analyze the association of travel distance with cTNM status, UICC stage at primary diagnosis, and survival outcomes of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.

Methods: We have analyzed data of 1921 consecutive HNC patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2019 at the head and neck cancer center of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm (CCCU), Germany. Postal code-based travel distance calculation in kilometers, TNM status, and UICC stage were recorded at initial diagnosis. The assembly of travel distance-related groups (short, intermediate, long-distance) has been investigated. Moreover, group-related survival and recurrence analysis have been performed.

Results: In contrast to observations from overseas, no association of travel distance and higher cTNM status or UICC stage at primary diagnosis has been observed. Furthermore, no significant differences for recurrence-free survival and overall survival by travel distance were detected.

Conclusion: In southern Germany, travel distance to head and neck cancer centers seems to be tolerable. Travel burden is not synonymous with travel distance alone but also involves sociodemographic, monetary, and disease-specific aspects as well as accessibility to proper infrastructure of transport and health care system.

Keywords: Cancer; Infrastructure; Telemedicine; Travel distance; Tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Douthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S (2015) Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health 129(6):611–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambroggi M, Biasini C, Del Giovane C, Fornari F, Cavanna L (2015) Distance as a barrier to cancer diagnosis and treatment: review of the literature. Oncologist 20(12):1378–1385. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0110 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Butow PN, Phillips F, Schweder J, White K, Underhill C, Goldstein D et al (2012) Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients living in urban and rural/regional areas: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 20(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1270-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xu Z, Becerra AZ, Justiniano CF, Boodry CI, Aquina CT, Swanger AA et al (2017) Is the distance worth it? patients with rectal cancer traveling to high-volume centers experience improved outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 60(12):1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000924 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nipp RD, Lee H, Gorton E, Lichtenstein M, Kuchukhidze S, Park E et al (2019) Addressing the financial burden of cancer clinical trial participation: longitudinal effects of an equity intervention. Oncologist 24(8):1048–1055. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0146 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources