Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Plant Transcriptome Assembly: Review and Benchmarking

In: Bioinformatics [Internet]. Brisbane (AU): Exon Publications; 2021 Mar 20. Chapter 7.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Plant Transcriptome Assembly: Review and Benchmarking

Sairam Behera et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Transcriptome assembly using next-generation sequencing data is an important step in a wide range of biological studies at the molecular level. The quality of computationally assembled transcriptomes affects various downstream analyses, such as gene structure prediction, isoform identification, and gene expression analysis. However, the actual accuracy of assembled transcriptomes is usually unknown. Furthermore, assembly quality depends on various factors such as the method used, the parameters (for example, k-mers) used with the method, and the transcript to be assembled. Users often choose an assembly method based solely on availability without considering differences among methods, as well as choices of the parameters. This is partly due to the lack of suitable benchmarking datasets. In this chapter, we provide a review of computational approaches used for transcriptome assembly (genome-guided, de novo, and ensemble), factors that affect assembly performance including those particularly important for plant transcriptomes, and how the transcriptome assembly performance can be assessed. Using examples from plant transcriptomes, we further illustrate how simulated benchmark datasets can be generated and used to compare the quality of transcriptome assemblies and how the performance of transcriptome assemblers can be assessed using various metrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ozsolak F, Milos PM. RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(2):87–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2934 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin JA, Wang Z. Next-generation transcriptome assembly. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(10):671–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3068 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stark R, Grzelak M, Hadfield J. RNA sequencing: the teenage years. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20(11):631–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0150-2 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vijay N, Poelstra JW, Künstner A, Wolf JB. Challenges and strategies in transcriptome assembly and differential gene expression quantification. A comprehensive in silico assessment of RNA-seq experiments. Mol Ecol. 2013;22(3):620–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12014 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hsieh PH, Oyang YJ, Chen CY. Effect of de novo transcriptome assembly on transcript quantification. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8304. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44499-3 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources