Reply: Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?
- PMID: 33878087
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007833
Reply: Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?
Comment on
-
Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jun;145(6):1073e-1088e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006821. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 32459782 Review.
-
Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):892e-893e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007832. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021. PMID: 33878100 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hopper RA, Ettinger RE, Purnell CA, Dover MS, Pereira AR, Tunçbilek G. Thirty years later: What has craniofacial distraction osteogenesis surgery replaced? Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:1073e–1088e.
-
- Tong H, Wang X, Song T, et al.Trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis for midfacial hypoplasia in growing patients with cleft lip and palate: Clinical outcomes and analysis of skeletal changes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:144–155.
-
- Cetrulo CL Jr, Knox KR, Brown DJ, et al.Stem cells and distraction osteogenesis: Endothelial progenitor cells home to the ischemic generate in activation and consolidation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:1053–1064; discussion 1065–1067.
-
- Savoldi F, Tsoi JKH, Paganelli C, Matinlinna JP. The biomechanical properties of human craniofacial sutures and relevant variables in sutural distraction osteogenesis: A critical review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2018;24:25–36.
-
- Tindlund RS. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994;31:295–308.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
