Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?
- PMID: 33878100
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007832
Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?
Comment in
-
Reply: Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):893e-895e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007833. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021. PMID: 33878087 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jun;145(6):1073e-1088e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006821. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 32459782 Review.
References
-
- Hopper RA, Ettinger RE, Purnell CA, Dover MS, Pereira AR, Tunçbilek G. Thirty years later: What has craniofacial distraction osteogenesis surgery replaced? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145:1073e–1088e.
-
- Tong H, Wang X, Song T, et al. Trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis for midfacial hypoplasia in growing patients with cleft lip and palate: Clinical outcomes and analysis of skeletal changes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:144–155.
-
- Huse M. Mechanical forces in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:679–690.
-
- Yang Y, Pan Q, Zou K, et al. Administration of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells in lengthening phase accelerates early bone consolidation in rat distraction osteogenesis model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11:129.
-
- Doro DH, Grigoriadis AE, Liu KJ. Calvarial suture-derived stem cells and their contribution to cranial bone repair. Front Physiol. 2017;8:956.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
