Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Aug 15;127(16):2880-2887.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33604. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Early ultrasound evaluation identifies excellent responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy among patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Early ultrasound evaluation identifies excellent responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy among patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Beatriz E Adrada et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Heterogeneity exists in the response of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to standard anthracycline (AC)/taxane-based neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), with 40% to 50% of patients having a pathologic complete response (pCR) to therapy. Early assessment of the imaging response during NAST may identify a subset of TNBCs that are likely to have a pCR upon completion of treatment. The authors aimed to evaluate the performance of early ultrasound (US) after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant NAST in identifying excellent responders to NAST among patients with TNBC.

Methods: Two hundred fifteen patients with TNBC were enrolled in the ongoing ARTEMIS (A Robust TNBC Evaluation Framework to Improve Survival) clinical trial. The patients were divided into a discovery cohort (n = 107) and a validation cohort (n = 108). A receiver operating characteristic analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to model the probability of a pCR on the basis of the tumor volume reduction (TVR) percentage by US from the baseline to after 2 cycles of AC.

Results: Overall, 39.3% of the patients (42 of 107) achieved a pCR. A positive predictive value (PPV) analysis identified a cutoff point of 80% TVR after 2 cycles; the pCR rate was 77% (17 of 22) in patients with a TVR ≥ 80%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92; P < .0001). In the validation cohort, the pCR rate was 44%. The PPV for pCR with a TVR ≥ 80% after 2 cycles was 76% (95% CI, 55%-91%), and the AUC was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.87; P < .0001).

Conclusions: The TVR percentage by US evaluation after 2 cycles of NAST may be a cost-effective early imaging biomarker for a pCR to AC/taxane-based NAST.

Keywords: breast cancer; imaging; neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST); triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Imaging schema in patients with triple negative breast cancer according to the ARTEMIS study protocol.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Images of a 52-year-old woman with triple negative breast cancer in the right breast. (a) Craniocaudal mammogram shows an oval mass (arrow) correlating with the palpable abnormality (triangle). (b, c) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor at baseline evaluation show a hypoechoic mass measuring 2.9 × 2.6 × 1.9 cm. (d, e) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide show the tumor measuring 1.8 × 1.7 × 0.9 cm, with an 80% calculated reduction in tumor volume, suggestive of treatment response predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR). The patient completed neoadjuvant systemic therapy and underwent breast-conserving surgery, and surgical pathology evaluation showed a pCR.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Images of a 52-year-old woman with triple negative breast cancer in the right breast. (a) Craniocaudal mammogram shows an oval mass (arrow) correlating with the palpable abnormality (triangle). (b, c) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor at baseline evaluation show a hypoechoic mass measuring 2.9 × 2.6 × 1.9 cm. (d, e) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide show the tumor measuring 1.8 × 1.7 × 0.9 cm, with an 80% calculated reduction in tumor volume, suggestive of treatment response predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR). The patient completed neoadjuvant systemic therapy and underwent breast-conserving surgery, and surgical pathology evaluation showed a pCR.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Images of a 52-year-old woman with triple negative breast cancer in the right breast. (a) Craniocaudal mammogram shows an oval mass (arrow) correlating with the palpable abnormality (triangle). (b, c) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor at baseline evaluation show a hypoechoic mass measuring 2.9 × 2.6 × 1.9 cm. (d, e) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide show the tumor measuring 1.8 × 1.7 × 0.9 cm, with an 80% calculated reduction in tumor volume, suggestive of treatment response predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR). The patient completed neoadjuvant systemic therapy and underwent breast-conserving surgery, and surgical pathology evaluation showed a pCR.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Images of a 52-year-old woman with triple negative breast cancer in the right breast. (a) Craniocaudal mammogram shows an oval mass (arrow) correlating with the palpable abnormality (triangle). (b, c) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor at baseline evaluation show a hypoechoic mass measuring 2.9 × 2.6 × 1.9 cm. (d, e) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide show the tumor measuring 1.8 × 1.7 × 0.9 cm, with an 80% calculated reduction in tumor volume, suggestive of treatment response predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR). The patient completed neoadjuvant systemic therapy and underwent breast-conserving surgery, and surgical pathology evaluation showed a pCR.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Images of a 52-year-old woman with triple negative breast cancer in the right breast. (a) Craniocaudal mammogram shows an oval mass (arrow) correlating with the palpable abnormality (triangle). (b, c) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor at baseline evaluation show a hypoechoic mass measuring 2.9 × 2.6 × 1.9 cm. (d, e) Longitudinal and transverse gray-scale ultrasound images of the tumor after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide show the tumor measuring 1.8 × 1.7 × 0.9 cm, with an 80% calculated reduction in tumor volume, suggestive of treatment response predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR). The patient completed neoadjuvant systemic therapy and underwent breast-conserving surgery, and surgical pathology evaluation showed a pCR.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Positive predictive value (PPV) for pathologic complete response (pCR) by percentage reduction in tumor volume after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in the discovery cohort (a) and the validation cohort (b). The graph shows a PPV of 77% and 76% for pCR prediction at 80% volume reduction (vertical dotted lines) in the discovery and the validation cohorts, respectively. PPV is shown in red solid line and its 95% exact confident intervals are shown in blue dashed lines.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Positive predictive value (PPV) for pathologic complete response (pCR) by percentage reduction in tumor volume after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in the discovery cohort (a) and the validation cohort (b). The graph shows a PPV of 77% and 76% for pCR prediction at 80% volume reduction (vertical dotted lines) in the discovery and the validation cohorts, respectively. PPV is shown in red solid line and its 95% exact confident intervals are shown in blue dashed lines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dawson SJ, Provenzano E, Caldas C. Triple negative breast cancers: clinical and prognostic implications. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45 Suppl 1: 27–40. - PubMed
    1. Schmadeka R, Harmon BE, Singh M. Triple-negative breast carcinoma: current and emerging concepts. Am J Clin Pathol 2014; 141: 462–477. - PubMed
    1. Lebert JM, Lester R, Powell E, et al. Advances in the systemic treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Curr Oncol 2018; 25: S142–S150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masuda H, Baggerly KA, Wang Y, et al. Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19: 5533–5540. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Palma G, Frasci G, Chirico A, et al. Triple negative breast cancer: looking for the missing link between biology and treatments. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 26560–26574. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms