How Can Policymakers be Encouraged to Support People With Spinal Cord Injury-Scoping Review
- PMID: 33878912
- PMCID: PMC9109570
- DOI: 10.1177/21925682211005406
How Can Policymakers be Encouraged to Support People With Spinal Cord Injury-Scoping Review
Abstract
Study design: Scoping review.
Objective: Regarding that inappropriate medical care approaches, absence of rehabilitation services, and existing barriers in physical, social, and policy environments lead to poor outcomes in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and provision for appropriate interventions and care must be created by health policymakers, we conducted this scoping review to investigate how policymakers can be persuaded to set new plans for individuals with SCI.
Methods: This review was performed according to Arksey and O'Malley's framework. PubMed was searched in February2019 without language limitation. We looked for other potential gray literature sources and some professional websites. References sections of selected articles were also scanned for other relevant literature.
Results: We included literature that met inclusion criteria to answer our research question. The literature was divided into 3 categories. The first category included economic impact of SCI. The second category included the role of research and developing research strategy. The third category included effective interaction and communication with policymakers.
Conclusion: It is essential to consider multiple factors for influencing policymakers' decisions. These factors include knowing how to communicate with policymakers and presenting constructive ideas, providing a source of valid, reliable, and consistent data, considering the role of patients' advocacy groups and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and presentation of the importance of early intervention in reducing healthcare system costs. Ultimately, the goal is to have a comprehensive and flexible plan for influencing policymakers.
Keywords: health care system; legislation; policy makers; spinal cord injury; support.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Do evidence summaries increase health policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 10;14(1):1-52. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.8. eCollection 2018. Campbell Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 37131376 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013. PMID: 23522333 Free PMC article.
-
Scoping review of resources for integrating evidence-based supported employment into spinal cord injury rehabilitation.Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jul;41(14):1719-1726. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1443161. Epub 2018 Feb 27. Disabil Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 29485303
-
Models of Telehealth Service Delivery in Adults With Spinal Cord Injuries: Scoping Review.JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jun 29;10:e41186. doi: 10.2196/41186. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023. PMID: 37384377 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Exploring barriers to rehabilitation for individuals with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study in Iran.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12284-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 39876013 Free PMC article.
-
Improving quality of care in traumatic spinal column/spinal cord injuries (TSC/SCI) in Iran: a policy brief.Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2024 Dec 26;10(1):82. doi: 10.1038/s41394-024-00694-7. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2024. PMID: 39725766
-
"I am not the same as before": a mixed-methods study on depression in people with spinal injury in Qatar.Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 21;15:1288772. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1288772. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38455515 Free PMC article.
-
Priorities and opportunities for advocacy in SCI: An international web-based review.J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 May;48(3):367-375. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2369736. Epub 2024 Jul 8. J Spinal Cord Med. 2025. PMID: 38976887 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization. International perspectives on spinal cord injury: World Health Organization/International Spinal Cord Society; 2013.
-
- World Health Organization. Fact-Sheets/Spinal Cord Injury. spinal cord injury; Accessed 19 November, 2013.
-
- Babamohamadi H, Negarandeh R, Dehghan-Nayeri N. Barriers to and facilitators of coping with spinal cord injury for Iranian patients: a qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2011;13(2):207–215. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous