Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 20;21(1):311.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03785-7.

Comprehensively addressing postpartum maternal health: a content and image review of commercially available mobile health apps

Laura Tucker  1 , Alan Cuevas Villagomez  2 , Tamar Krishnamurti  3
Affiliations

Comprehensively addressing postpartum maternal health: a content and image review of commercially available mobile health apps

Laura Tucker et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The United States is currently facing a maternal morbidity and mortality crisis, with the highest rates of any resource-rich nation. In efforts to address this, new guidelines for postpartum care suggest that mobile health (mHealth) apps can help provide complementary clinical support for new mothers during the postpartum period. However, to date no study has evaluated the quality of existing mHealth tools targeted to this time period in terms of sufficiency of maternal health information, inclusivity of people of color, and app usability.

Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards were used to review the peripartum apps from the Apple and Google Play stores in either the Health/Fitness, Medical, or Education categories. Apps were evaluated for extent and quality of maternal health information and inclusivity of people of color using an a priori coding scheme. App usability was evaluated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) score.

Results: Of the 301 apps from the Apple and Google Play stores, 25 met criteria for final evaluation. Of the 30 maternal health topics coded for, the median number addressed by apps was 19.5 (65%). Peripartum behaviors were more frequently addressed than peripartum outpatient care topics and peripartum acute health risks. The coverage of maternal health information and inclusivity of people of color in app imagery both correlated positively with the MARS usability score of the app. Only 8 apps (32%) portrayed greater than 24% images of people of color- the percent of non-white Americans according to 2019 census estimates. There was no correlation between MARS usability score and number of app users, as estimated by number of ratings for the app available on the app store. In addition, apps with evidence-based maternal health information had greater MARS engagement, information, and aesthetics scores. However, presence of evidence-based information did not correlate with greater numbers of app users.

Conclusions: Current commercially available peripartum apps range widely in quality. Overall current app offerings generally do not provide adequate maternal health information and are not optimally accessible to the target users in terms of inclusivity of women of color or app usability. Apps delivering evidence-based information and more usable design are more likely to meet these standards but are not more likely to be downloaded by users.

Keywords: Digital health; Health disparity; Health education; Maternal health; Maternal morbidity; Mobile apps; Mobile health; Peripartum; Postpartum; Pregnancy; mHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

TK is a co-founder of Naima Health LLC, which develops digital health tools to engage patients in clinical care.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart of search process for educational mHealth apps with postpartum maternal morbidity and mortality risk content
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MARS usability score vs percent of maternal health information addressed by app
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percent of mobile applications addressing elements of peripartum behaviors, peripartum outpatient care, and peripartum acute health risks
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hoyert DL, Uddin SF, Miniño AM. Evaluation of the pregnancy status checkbox on the identification of maternal deaths. 2020. - PubMed
    1. Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011–2013. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):366–373. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wisner KL, Sit DK, McShea MC, Rizzo DM, Zoretich RA, Hughes CL, et al. Onset timing, thoughts of self-harm, and diagnoses in postpartum women with screen-positive depression findings. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(5):490–8. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alhusen JL, Ray E, Sharps P, Bullock L. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Women's Health. 2015;24(1):100–106. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4872. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Ko JY, Farr SL, Tong VT, Bruce FC, et al. Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now? J Womens Health. 2014;23(1):3–9. 10.1089/jwh.2013.4617. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types