Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Apr 20;21(1):200.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03190-6.

Validated screening tools to identify common mental disorders in perinatal and postpartum women in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gracia Fellmeth  1 , Siân Harrison  2 , Charles Opondo  2 , Manisha Nair  2 , Jennifer J Kurinczuk  2 , Fiona Alderdice  2   3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Validated screening tools to identify common mental disorders in perinatal and postpartum women in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gracia Fellmeth et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Perinatal common mental disorders are associated with significant adverse outcomes for women and their families, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Early detection through screening with locally-validated tools can improve outcomes.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar for articles on the validation of screening tools for common mental disorders in perinatal women in India, with no language or date restrictions. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. We used bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models to calculate pooled summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity was assessed by visualising the distance of individual studies from the summary curve.

Results: Seven studies involving 1003 women were analysed. All studies assessed the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in identifying perinatal depression. No validation studies of any other screening tools were identified. Using a common threshold of ≥13 the EPDS had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 88·9% (95%CI 77·4-94·9) and 93·4 (95%CI 81·5-97·8), respectively. Using optimal thresholds (range ≥ 9 to ≥13) the EPDS had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 94·4% (95%CI 81·7-98·4) and 90·8 (95%CI 83·7-95·0), respectively.

Conclusion: The EPDS is psychometrically valid in diverse Indian settings and its use in routine maternity care could improve detection of perinatal depression. Further research is required to validate screening tools for other perinatal common mental disorders in India.

Keywords: Common mental disorder; India; Low- and middle-income country (LMIC); Perinatal; Screening; Systematic review; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scatterplot of sensitivity vs. specificity of the EPDS for detecting depression in each study using optimal thresholds (left panel) and common threshold of ≥13 (right panel)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve using optimal threshold (left panel) and common threshold of ≥13 (right panel)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, Thornicroft G, Baingana F, Bolton P, et al. The lancet commission on global mental health and sustainable development. Lancet. 2018;392(10157):1553–98. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) 2017. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254610/WHO-MSD-MER-2017... (last accessed 15 June 2020).
    1. Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, et al. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1800–19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61277-0. - PubMed
    1. Gelaye B, Rondon MB, Araya R, Williams MA. Epidemiology of maternal depression, risk factors, and child outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(10):973–982. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30284-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woody CA, Ferrari AJ, Siskind DJ, Whiteford HA, Harris MG. A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. J Affect Disord. 2017;219:86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types