Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 20;7(1):98.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00839-7.

Prevention of cervical cancer through two HPV-based screen-and-treat implementation models in Malawi: protocol for a cluster randomized feasibility trial

Affiliations

Prevention of cervical cancer through two HPV-based screen-and-treat implementation models in Malawi: protocol for a cluster randomized feasibility trial

Jennifer H Tang et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality among Malawian women, despite being a largely preventable disease. Implementing a cervical cancer screening and preventive treatment (CCSPT) program that utilizes rapid human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected cervicovaginal samples for screening and thermal ablation for treatment may achieve greater coverage than current programs that use visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for screening and cryotherapy for treatment. Furthermore, self-sampling creates the opportunity for community-based screening to increase uptake in populations with low screening rates. Malawi's public health system utilizes regularly scheduled outreach and village-based clinics to provide routine health services like family planning. Cancer screening is not yet included in these community services. Incorporating self-sampled HPV testing into national policy could address cervical cancer screening barriers in Malawi, though at present the effectiveness, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness still need to be demonstrated.

Methods: We designed a cluster randomized feasibility trial to determine the effectiveness, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and budget impact of two models for integrating a HPV-based CCSPT program into family planning (FP) services in Malawi: model 1 involves only clinic-based self-sampled HPV testing, whereas model 2 includes both clinic-based and community-based self-sampled HPV testing. Our algorithm involves self-collection of samples for HPV GeneXpert® testing, visual inspection with acetic acid for HPV-positive women to determine ablative treatment eligibility, and same-day thermal ablation for treatment-eligible women. Interventions will be implemented at 14 selected facilities. Our primary outcome will be the uptake of cervical cancer screening and family planning services during the 18 months of implementation, which will be measured through an Endline Household Survey. We will also conduct mixed methods assessments to understand the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the interventions, and a cost analysis to assess budget impact.

Discussion: Our trial will provide in-depth information on the implementation of clinic-only and clinic-and-community models for integrating self-sampled HPV testing CCSPT with FP services in Malawi. Findings will provide valuable insight for policymakers and implementers in Malawi and other resource-limited settings with high cervical cancer burden.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04286243 . Registered on February 26, 2020.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Community; Family planning; HPV testing; Implementation; Malawi; Screening; Self-sampling; Sub-Saharan Africa; Thermal ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. JSS has received research grants and consultancies from BD Diagnostics and Hologic, and supply donations from Rovers and Arbor Vita over the past 5 years.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study phases, with activities listed for each phase. Italicized portion indicates site selection and implementation of the two models under the appropriate phases. *Due to constraints on community services offered at two matched facilities, these facilities were both assigned to model 1 and dropped from randomization scheme. Thus, 9 facilities will implement model 1 and 7 will implement model 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient flow for screening and treatment. Blue boxes and darker arrows indicate the community components that will only be present in model 2. *Note that result return will be delayed for community-screened women; same-day results will only be possible for women screened at facilities. HSA, health surveillance assistant

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Agency for Cancer Research (FR). Malawi fact sheet, 2019 [Internet]. World Health Organization: 2019 May. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/454-malawi-fact-sh.... Accessed 13 May 2020.
    1. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjose S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):E191–E203. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Msyamboza KP, Phiri T, Sichali W, Kwenda W, Kachale F. Cervical cancer screening uptake and challenges in Malawi from 2011 to 2015: retrospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3530-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (CH). WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention. South Africa: WHO Africa; 2013. 40p. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/cancers/screening_an.... Accessed 13 May 2020 - PubMed
    1. Mustafa RA, Santesso N, Khatib R, Mustafa AA, Wiercioch W, Kehar R, Gandhi S, Chen Y, Cheung A, Hopkins J, Ma B, Lloyd N, Wu D, Broutet N, Schünemann HJ. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the accuracy of HPV tests, visual inspection with acetic acid, cytology, and colposcopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):259–265. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.024. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources