Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 12:14:953-960.
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S301205. eCollection 2021.

Reliability and Validity of the Adapted Chinese Version of the Satisfaction of Adolescents with Postoperative Pain Management - Idiopathic Scoliosis (SAP-S) Scale

Affiliations

Reliability and Validity of the Adapted Chinese Version of the Satisfaction of Adolescents with Postoperative Pain Management - Idiopathic Scoliosis (SAP-S) Scale

Zheng Zhang et al. J Pain Res. .

Abstract

Study design: A prospective study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal reliability and structure validity of an adapted simplified Chinese version of the Satisfaction of Adolescents with Postoperative pain management - idiopathic Scoliosis (SAP-S) scale in mainland China.

Summary of background data: Pain management is a major issue for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusions. There is a lack of valid scales for evaluating patients' satisfaction with postoperative pain management. The SAP-S was proven to be a valid and reliable measure in English and French.

Methods: The SAP-S was translated into Chinese according to the internationally recognized guidelines. A total of 95 AIS patients undergoing posterior fusion surgery completed the CSAP-S, along with other self-reported questionnaires, including the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaires. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the CSAP-S were determined.

Results: The SAP-S was successfully translated into Chinese. All patients completed the CSAP-S twice and the other instruments. The CSAP-S had good internal consistency and test-retest reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficient measuring 0.895 and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) measuring 0.97. Elimination of any one item did not result in a value of Cronbach's alpha of <0.80. A good construct validity was shown by good correlation with bodily pain (r=0.883, p=0.004) and social functioning (r=0.786, p=0.002) domains of SF-36 and pain (r=0.752, p=0.001) and satisfaction with management (r=0.746, p=0.005) domains of SRS-22.

Conclusion: The CSAP-S demonstrated good internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity, and may be used for the evaluation of AIS patients' satisfaction with postoperative pain management in mainland China.

Keywords: Chinese adaptation; SAP-S; idiopathic scoliosis; pain management; satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Bland–Altman plot for test–retest agreement of the CSAP-S. The grey dashed line indicates the 95% (±1.96 standard deviation) limits of agreement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scree plot to determine the number of factors to retain.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hresko MT. Clinical practice. Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(9):834–841. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1209063 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bianconi M, Ferraro L, Ricci R, et al. The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ropivacaine continuous wound instillation after spine fusion surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:166–72, table of contents. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000093310.47375.44 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gillies ML, Smith LN, Parry-Jones WL. Postoperative pain assessment and management in adolescents. Pain. 1999;79(2):207–215. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00178-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borgeat A, Blumenthal S. Postoperative pain management following scoliosis surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21(3):313–316. doi:10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f82baa - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H. Postoperative pain relief–what is the issue? Br J Anaesth. 1994;72(4):375–378. doi:10.1093/bja/72.4.375 - DOI - PubMed