Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) test: an unproven technology
- PMID: 33880419
- PMCID: PMC8045470
- DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab010
Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) test: an unproven technology
Abstract
This article addresses the limitations of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) methodology to increase implantation. Such limitations vary from the assumed inconsistency of the endometrial biopsy, the variable number of genes found to be dysregulated in endometrium samples without the embryonal-induced effect, the failure to account for the simultaneous serum progesterone level, and the expected low percentage of patients who may need this add-on procedure, to the difficulties in synchronising the endometrium with hormone replacements in successive cycles and the inherent perinatal risks associated with routine cryopreservation of embryos. Without a gold standard to compare, the claim that the window of implantation (WOI) might be off by ±12 h only requires a good argument for the advantage it provides to human procreation, knowing that embryos can linger for days before actual embedding starts and that the window is actually a few days. The intra-patient variations in the test need to be addressed. In summary, like all other add-ons, it is doubtful whether the ERA test use can significantly enhance implantation success rates.
Keywords: ART; ERA test; IVF; RIF; add-ons; implantation failure.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
References
-
- Ben Rafael Z. Repeated Implantation Failure (RIF): a call for action or an iatrogenic meaningless definition that generates unnecessary costly usage of add-ons procedure? Hum Reprod 2020;35:1479–1483. - PubMed
-
- Ben Rafael Z. Should we still offer elective freeze all for everybody? Hum Reprod 2020b;35:2179–2184. - PubMed
-
- Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, Simón C, Remohí J, Jenkins J, Pellicer A.. Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles. Hum Reprod 2010;25:2092–2100. - PubMed
-
- Chen Z-J, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, Yang J, Liu J, Wei D, Weng N.. et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2016;375:523–533. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources