Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 19;101(5):adv00456.
doi: 10.2340/00015555-3807.

Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Angioedema: A Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Angioedema: A Literature Review

Anna Trier Heiberg Brix et al. Acta Derm Venereol. .

Abstract

Angioedema and hereditary angioedema are characterized by swelling of the subcutaneous and/or submucosal tissue, resulting in localized oedema. The rarity, but also the diverse clinical presentation, of these conditions can be challenging regarding diagnosis, treatment, and management. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are data received directly from the patient, providing the patient's perspective on various subjects regarding health and well-being. PROMs can be helpful tools to optimize treatment and long-term management of conditions. A major challenge regarding the consistent use of PROMs in clinical settings in Scandinavia is language availability; many of the validated PROMs for hereditary angioedema and angioedema lack translations into the Nordic languages. The litterature search yielded 9 different PROM tools for angioedema and hereditary angioedema. Five were found suitable for use in clinical practice in Europe. Even though several PROMs exist they are not used consistent. Accessible electronic PROMs and careful planning is required to implement PROMs optimally in routine care processes.

Keywords: angioedema; patient-reported outcome measure; hereditary angioedema.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rye Rasmussen EH, Bindslev-Jensen C, Bygum A. Angioedema – assessment and treatment. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2012; 132: 2391–2395. - PubMed
    1. Belbézier A, Bocquet A, Bouillet L. Idiopathic angioedema: current challenges. J Asthma Allergy 2020; 13: 137–144. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pall AH, Lomholt AF, von Buchwald C, Bygum A, Rasmussen ER. Clinical features and disease course of primary angioedema patients in a tertiary care hospital. J Asthma Allergy 2020; 13: 225–236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zingale LC, Beltrami L, Zanichelli A, Maggioni L, Pappalardo E, Cicardi B, Cicardi M. Angioedema without urticaria: a large clinical survey. CMAJ 2006; 175: 1065–1070. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cicardi M, Aberer W, Banerji A, Bas M, Bernstein JA, Bork K, et al. Classification, diagnosis, and approach to treatment for angioedema: consensus report from the Hereditary Angioedema International Working Group. Allergy 2014; 69: 602–616. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources