Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;31(4):675-698.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09975-6. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

Systematic Review of the Impact on Return to Work of Return-to-Work Coordinators

M Dol  1 , S Varatharajan  1 , E Neiterman  1 , E McKnight  1 , M Crouch  1 , E McDonald  1 , C Malachowski  2 , N Dali  1 , E Giau  1 , E MacEachen  3   4
Affiliations

Systematic Review of the Impact on Return to Work of Return-to-Work Coordinators

M Dol et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose We conducted a systematic review to understand the impact that return-to-work coordinators (RTWCs) have on return to work (RTW) outcomes for sick/injured workers. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ABI Inform were searched from January 1, 2000 to September 16, 2020. Of 2,927 retrieved and screened citations, 14 quantitative articles fulfilled the eligibility and quality criteria. Quality assessment, data extraction, and evidence synthesis followed article screening. Results We focused on the impact of RTWCs for outcomes of work absence, RTW rates, quality of life, and cost-benefit. Our final synthesis included 14 articles. We found strong evidence that work absence duration was reduced when workers had face-to-face contact with a RTWC. As well, there was strong evidence linking face-to-face RTWC interventions with higher RTW rates and moderate evidence that this reduced intervention costs. RTWC interventions involving the identification of barriers and facilitators to RTW also showed promising results. However, only limited evidence was found that RTWCs improved quality of life for workers. Conclusions Our synthesis identifies key features of RTW interventions that improve RTW outcomes. Future high-quality research should measure long-term outcomes of RTWC interventions to evaluate sustainability and consider the nature of work. They should also focus on RTWC impact on worker quality of life assessments and for older workers and workers with chronic health conditions.

Keywords: Case management; Return to work coordination; Systematic review; Work absence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. OECD Publishing. Paris; 2010. https://www.oecd.org/publications/sickness-disability-and-work-breaking-... . Accessed 1 Nov 2019.
    1. Belin A, Dupont C, Oules L, Kuipers Y, Fries-Tersch E. Rehabilitation and return to work: analysis report on EU policies, strategies and programmes. Luxembourg: Luxemb Publ Off Eur Union; 2016.
    1. OECD. Activation strategies for stronger and more inclusive labour markets in G20 countries: key policy challenges and good practices; 2013. https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/G20-2013ReportActivation.pdf . Accessed 1 Nov 2019.
    1. Viikari-Juntura E, Kausto J, Shiri R, Kaila-Kangas L, Takala E. Return to work after early part-time sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):134–143. - PubMed - DOI - PMC
    1. Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–631. - PubMed - DOI - PMC

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources