Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jan;37(1):210-221.
doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.605. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ambrish Singh et al. Korean J Intern Med. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background/aims: Conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have been trialed in osteoarthritis (OA). Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which has shown its effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis, has been trialed for the treatment of OA; however, its efficacy and safety remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate efficacy and safety of HCQ for the treatment of OA.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception through June 2020. Two reviewers independently screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HCQ with placebo or other active-comparators for the treatment of knee, hand, or hip OA, extracted data, and performed Cochrane risk of bias assessments.

Results: Six RCTs, four in hand OA, two in knee OA, consisting of 842 patients (436 in HCQ arm, 406 in control arm) were included. RCTs were conducted between 2012 and 2020, one each at UK, Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Iran, and Egypt; follow-up period ranged 24 to 52 weeks. High-quality evidence showed no clinically important pain reduction with HCQ compared to placebo/active-control in hand OA (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.20 to 0.48). Effect on pain reduction in knee and hand OA was small and non-significant (SMD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.25). High-quality evidence showed no improvement in dysfunction with HCQ compared to placebo in hand OA patients (SMD, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.40). Effect on dysfunction improvement in knee and hand OA was modest and statistically non-significant (SMD, -0.20; 95% CI,-0.57 to 0.18). No improvement in quality of life was observed in hand OA.

Conclusion: HCQ has no benefit in reducing pain and improving physical function in hand or knee OA patients.

Keywords: Hydroxychloroquine; Meta-analysis; Osteoarthritis; Randomized controlled trial; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cochrane risk of bias assessment.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for change in osteoarthritis (OA) associated pain. Abou-Raya et al. [24] was published as an abstract in 2013 and is still not published as full-text; the author did not make the data available upon e-mail request. SE, standard error; IV, generic inverse-variance random-effect meta-analysis; CI, confidence interval; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; CLO, clodronate.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for change in osteoarthritis (OA) associated dysfunction. Abou-Raya et al. [24] was published as an abstract in 2013 and is still not published as full-text; the author did not make the data available upon e-mail request. SE, standard error; IV, generic inverse-variance random-effect meta-analysis; CI, confidence interval; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Risk difference for serious adverse effects (SAEs) and adverse effects (AEs) with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). M-H, Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect meta-analysis; CI, confidence interval; CLO, clodronate; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine.
None

Comment in

References

    1. World Health Organization . Geneva (CH): WHO; 2014. Priority diseases and reasons for inclusion: osteoarthritis [Internet] [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/Ch6_12Osteo.pdf?ua=1.
    1. Haq I, Murphy E, Dacre J. Osteoarthritis. Postgrad Med J. 2003;79:377–383. - PMC - PubMed
    1. United Nations . World Population to 2300. New York (NY): United Nations; 2004.
    1. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Smith E, et al. Global, regional and national burden of osteoarthritis 1990 2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:819–828. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Geneva (CH): WHO; 2013. Chronic diseases and health promotion: chronic rheumatic conditions [Internet] [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/topics/rheumatic/en/

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources