Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 2;12(1):328-341.
doi: 10.1080/21645698.2021.1914290.

Fitness of Insect-resistant transgenic rice T1C-19 under four growing conditions combining land use and weed competition

Affiliations

Fitness of Insect-resistant transgenic rice T1C-19 under four growing conditions combining land use and weed competition

Jianmei Fu et al. GM Crops Food. .

Abstract

Transgene escape into natural ecosystems through seed spraying or transgene introgression may potentially cause environmental biosafety problems. In this study, we assessed the environmental risk of insect-resistant transgenic rice entering farmland margins or natural ecosystems adjacent to farmland. Transgenic Cry1C* rice (T1C-19) was used to study the effects of exogenous Cry1C* expression on vegetative and reproductive growth indices under different growing conditions using the following four combined treatments of land use and weeds: farmland and uncultivated land without weeds (F-NW and U-NW, respectively), and farmland and uncultivated land with weeds (F-W and U-W, respectively). The expression of Cry1C* protein under the U-NW, F-W, and U-W conditions was significantly lower than under the control condition, F-NW. Tiller number, biomass, filled grain number, filled grain weight, and other vegetative and reproductive indices were significantly lower in the rice line TIC-19 than in MH63 under F-NW and U-NW conditions, indicating a significant fitness cost. However, under F-W and U-W conditions, vegetative growth indices such as plant height, tiller number, and biomass, as well as reproductive growth indices such as filled grain number per plant, filled grain weight per plant, and seed setting rate in TIC-19 were similar to those in MH63, indicating a long-term coexistence. These results indicate a lower ecological risk of T1C-19 compared to MH63 under F-NW and U-NW, although their long-term coexistence may lead to potential ecological risks under F-W and U-W.

Keywords: Insect-resistant transgenic rice; expression of exogenous protein; fitness; uncultivated land; weed competition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cry1C* protein expression in leaves and stems under four simulated growing conditions during different growth stages in T1C-19. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among the five growth stages grown under the same conditions or grown under four conditions at the same growth stage of T1C-19 rice according to Duncan’s multiple range test (n = 5, P < .05)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Plant height (mean ± SEM) of T1C-19 and MH63 rice cultivated under four growing conditions combining land use and weeds. Values for T1C-19 rice with * and ** are significantly different from those for MH63 according to t-test (P < .05) and (P < .01), respectively (n = 20)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Tilling numbers per plant (Means ± SEM) of T1C-19 and MH63 rice cultivated under four growing conditions combining land use and weeds. Values for T1C-19 rice with * and ** are significantly different from those for MH63 according to t-test (P < .05) and (P < .01), respectively (n = 20)
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
SPAD values (Means ± SEM) of T1C-19 and MH63 rice cultivated under four growing conditions combining land use and weeds. Values for T1C-19 rice with ** are significantly different from those for MH63 according to t-test (P < .01, n = 20)
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Biomass (Means ± SEM) of T1C-19 and MH63 rice cultivated under four growing conditions combining land use and weeds. Values for T1C-19 rice with * and ** are significantly different from those for MH63 according to t-test (P < .05) and (P < .01), respectively (n = 10)
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
A low ecological risk of T1C-19 compared to MH63 under farmland and uncultivated land without weed, and ecological risk of their long-term coexistence under farmland and uncultivated land with weed

References

    1. ISAAA. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2017. Brief. 2017;52.
    1. Tang K, Green P, Xu YN, Sun XF, Gatehouse JA, Ronald P, Qi HX, Lu XG, Chirstou P, Kohli A. Particle-bombardment-mediated co-transformation of elite Chinese rice cultivars with genes conferring resistance to bacterial blight and sap-sucking insect pests. Planta. 1999;209(4):552–63. doi:10.1007/s004250050593. - DOI
    1. Tu JM, Zhang GA, Datta K, Xu CG, He YQ, Zhang QF. Field performance of transgenic elite commercial hybrid rice expressing Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(10):1101–04. doi:10.1038/80310. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen H, Tang W, Xu CG, Li XH, Lin YJ, Zhang QF. Transgenic indica rice plants harboring a synthetic cry2A* gene of Bacillus thuringiensis exhibit enhanced resistance against lepidopteran rice pests. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;111(7):1330–37. doi:10.1007/s00122-005-0062-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tang W, Chen H, Xu CG, Li XH, Lin YJ, Zhang QF. Development of insect-resistant transgenic indica rice with a synthetic cry1C* gene. Mol. Breed. 2006;18(1):1–10. doi:10.1007/s11032-006-9002-9. - DOI