Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 21;11(1):8624.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87581-5.

Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources

Affiliations

Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources

Live Skow Hofgaard et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Psychological resilience is indicated when individuals demonstrate good mental health despite exposure to significant stress or adversity. Good mental health may involve low levels of illbeing and/or high levels of wellbeing. There is still very limited knowledge about the potential differences between these outcomes in relation to stressors. We propose a distinction between type 1 and type 2 resilience, examine their underlying genetic and environmental architecture, and identify modifiable resilience factors. The data come from a population-based twin sample (N = 1987, mean age = 63) in the Norwegian Twin Registry. Type 1 and type 2 resilience are operationalised as the residual of anxiety/depression symptoms and life satisfaction, respectively, after lifetime cumulative adversity has been regressed out. We used biometric modelling and cotwin-control linear mixed models to estimate underlying factors and identify predictors while controlling for genetic confounding. The results support the notion of two separate, but partly overlapping types of resilience. We find heritabilities of 0.30 (type 1) and 0.24 (type 2) and a genetic correlation of 0.43. Potentially causal resilience factors include, but are not limited to, meaning in life, physical activity, positive affect and relationship satisfaction. Whereas some factors are associated with both resilience types, other factors are unique to each type.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results from the best fitting bivariate model. “A” indicates the latent additive genetic factors and “E” represents individual-specific environmental factors. The magnitude of each path is shown in the figure, including the percent of the variance in the observed variable accounted for by the latent factors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An illustration of the cotwin-control results with significant predictors (p < 0.05), based on Model 3. Hence, the illustration indicates unique and overlapping predictors for both types of resilience, unconfounded by shared environment and genetics.

References

    1. Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev. 2000;71:543–562. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00164. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masten AS. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. Am. Psychol. 2001;56:227–238. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rutter M. Resilience as a dynamic concept. Dev. Psychopathol. 2012;24:335–344. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonanno GA, Romero SA, Klein SI. The temporal elements of psychological resilience: An integrative framework for the study of individuals, families, and communities. Psychol. Inq. 2015;26:139–169. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2015.992677. - DOI
    1. Rutten BPF, et al. Resilience in mental health: Linking psychological and neurobiological perspectives. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2013;128:3–20. doi: 10.1111/acps.12095. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types