Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 22;21(1):81.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01247-4.

The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review

Affiliations

The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review

Jessica Sheringham et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Identifying how unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery arise is challenging. Experimental vignette studies can help, by isolating and manipulating potential drivers of differences in care. There is a lack of methodological and practical guidance on how to design and conduct these studies robustly. The aim of this study was to locate, methodologically assess, and synthesise the contribution of experimental vignette studies to the identification of drivers of unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery.

Methods: We used a scoping review approach. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL databases (2007-2019) using terms relating to vignettes and variations in healthcare. We screened title/abstracts and full text to identify studies using experimental vignettes to examine drivers of variations in healthcare delivery. Included papers were assessed against a methodological framework synthesised from vignette study design recommendations within and beyond healthcare.

Results: We located 21 eligible studies. Study participants were almost exclusively clinicians (18/21). Vignettes were delivered via text (n = 6), pictures (n = 6), video (n = 6) or interactively, using face-to-face, telephone or online simulated consultations (n = 3). Few studies evaluated the credibility of vignettes, and many had flaws in their wider study design. Ten were of good methodological quality. Studies contributed to understanding variations in care, most commonly by testing hypotheses that could not be examined directly using real patients.

Conclusions: Experimental vignette studies can be an important methodological tool for identifying how unwarranted variations in care can arise. Flaws in study design or conduct can limit their credibility or produce biased results. Their full potential has yet to be realised.

Keywords: Healthcare variation; Inequalities; Vignettes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA Flow diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Health Service (NHS) The NHS atlas of variation in healthcare series: reducing unwarranted variation to increase value and improve quality. 2016.
    1. Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Dartm. Atlas Health Care. https://www.dartmouthatlas.org/. Accessed 30 Jan 2021.
    1. Kapilashrami A, Hankivsky O. Intersectionality and why it matters to global health. Lancet. 2018;391:2589–2591. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31431-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldstein E, Elliott MN, Lehrman WG, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in patients’ perceptions of inpatient care using the HCAHPS survey. Med Care Res Rev MCRR. 2010;67:74–92. doi: 10.1177/1077558709341066. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weech-Maldonado R, Fongwa MN, Gutierrez P, et al. Language and regional differences in evaluations of Medicare managed care by Hispanics. Health Serv Res. 2008;43:552–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00796.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types