Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 22;11(4):e045702.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045702.

Swiss-wide multicentre evaluation and prediction of core outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: protocol for the ARCR_Pred cohort study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Swiss-wide multicentre evaluation and prediction of core outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: protocol for the ARCR_Pred cohort study

Laurent Audigé et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: In the field of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), reporting standards of published studies differ dramatically, notably concerning adverse events (AEs). In addition, prognostic studies are overall methodologically poor, based on small data sets and explore only limited numbers of influencing factors. We aim to develop prognostic models for individual ARCR patients, primarily for the patient-reported assessment of shoulder function (Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)) and the occurrence of shoulder stiffness 6 months after surgery. We also aim to evaluate the use of a consensus core event set (CES) for AEs and validate a severity classification for these events, considering the patient's perspective.

Methods and analysis: A cohort of 970 primary ARCR patients will be prospectively documented from several Swiss and German orthopaedic clinics up to 24 months postoperatively. Patient clinical examinations at 6 and 12 months will include shoulder range of motion and strength (Constant Score). Tendon repair integrity status will be assessed by ultrasound at 12 months. Patient-reported questionnaires at 6, 12 and 24 months will determine functional scores (subjective shoulder value, OSS), anxiety and depression scores, working status, sports activities, and quality of life (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level questionnaire). AEs will be documented according to a CES. Prognostic models will be developed using an internationally supported regression methodology. Multiple prognostic factors, including patient baseline demographics, psychological, socioeconomic and clinical factors, rotator cuff integrity, concomitant local findings, and (post)operative management factors, will be investigated.

Ethics and dissemination: This project contributes to the development of personalised risk predictions for supporting the surgical decision process in ARCR. The consensus CES may become an international reference for the reporting of complications in clinical studies and registries. Ethical approval was obtained on 1 April 2020 from the lead ethics committee (EKNZ, Basel, Switzerland; ID: 2019-02076). All participants will provide informed written consent before enrolment in the study.

Trial registration number: NCT04321005.

Protocol version: Version 2 (13 December 2019).

Keywords: musculoskeletal disorders; orthopaedic & trauma surgery; shoulder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study procedures. AE survey: surgeon and patient survey regarding AE severity (sev). Motion: shoulder range of motion. Rehab: recall on postoperative rehabilitation. *If MRI not possible. AE, adverse event; CES, core event set; CS, Constant Score; CT, arthro-CT; DE, German; EN, English; EQ-5D-5L, European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level questionnaire; FR, French; FU, follow-up; IT, Italian; NRS, Numeric Rating Scale; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; RC, rotator cuff; SSV, subjective shoulder value.

References

    1. Schmidt CC, Morrey BF. Management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: appropriate use criteria. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:1860–7. 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carr AJ, Cooper CD, Campbell MK, et al. . Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK Rotator Cuff Surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial]. Health Technol Assess 2015;19:1–218. 10.3310/hta19800 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moosmayer S, Lund G, Seljom US, et al. . At a 10-year follow-up, tendon repair is superior to physiotherapy in the treatment of small and medium-sized rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:1050–60. 10.2106/JBJS.18.01373 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grobet C, Audigé L, Eichler K, et al. . Cost-Utility analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective health economic study using real-world data. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2020;2:e193–205. 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Piper CC, Hughes AJ, Ma Y, et al. . Operative versus nonoperative treatment for the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:572–6. 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.032 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data