Endovascular therapies for pulmonary embolism
- PMID: 33889762
- PMCID: PMC8047492
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06574
Endovascular therapies for pulmonary embolism
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this article is to define the place of new endovascular methods for the management of pulmonary embolisms (PE), on the basis of a multidisciplinary consensus.
Method and results: Briefly, from the recent literature, for high-risk PE presenting with shock or cardiac arrest, systemic thrombolysis or embolectomy is recommended, while for lowrisk PE, anticoagulation alone is proposed. Normo-tense patients with PE but with biological or imaging signs of right heart dysfunction constitute a group known as "at intermediate risk" for which the therapeutic strategy remains controversial. In fact, some patients may require more aggressive treatment in addition to the anticoagulant treatment, because approximately 10% will decompensate hemodynamically with a high risk of mortality. Systemic thrombolysis may be an option, but with hemorrhagic risks, particularly intra cranial. Various hybrid pharmacomechanical approaches are proposed to maintain the benefits of thrombolysis while reducing its risks, but the overall clinical experience of these different techniques remains limited. Patients with high intermediate and high risk pulmonary embolism should be managed by a multidisciplinary team combining the skills of cardiologists, resuscitators, pneumologists, interventional radiologists and cardiac surgeons. Such a team can determine which intervention - thrombolysis alone or assisted, percutaneous mechanical fragmentation of the thrombus or surgical embolectomy - is best suited to a particular patient.
Conclusions: This consensus document define the place of endovascular thrombectomy based on an appropriate risk stratification of PE.
Keywords: Embolectomy; Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy; Pulmonary embolism; Thrombectomy; Thrombolytic therapy.
© 2021 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Park B., Messina L., Dargon P., Huang W., Ciocca R., Anderson F.A. Recent trends in clinical outcomes and resource utilization for pulmonary embolism in the United States: findings from the nationwide inpatient sample. Chest. 2009;136(4):983–990. - PubMed
-
- Konstantinides S.V., Meyer G., Becattini C., Bueno H., Geersing G.J., Harjola V.P. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Respir. J. 2019;54(3) 2019. - PubMed
-
- Konstantinides S.V., Torbicki A., Agnelli G., Danchin N., Fitzmaurice D., Galie N. Corrigendum to: 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36(39):2642. - PubMed
-
- Kahn S.R., Houweling A.H., Granton J., Rudski L., Dennie C., Hirsch A. Long-term outcomes after pulmonary embolism: current knowledge and future research. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis. 2014;25(5):407–415. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
