Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;11(1_suppl):45S-55S.
doi: 10.1177/21925682211004895.

Spine Instrumented Surgery on a Budget-Tools for Lowering Cost Without Changing Outcome

Affiliations

Spine Instrumented Surgery on a Budget-Tools for Lowering Cost Without Changing Outcome

Ilyas Eli et al. Global Spine J. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Study design: Review article.

Objectives: There have been substantial increases in the utilization of complex spinal surgery in the last 20 years. Spinal instrumented surgery is associated with high costs as well as significant variation in approach and care. The objective of this manuscript is to identify and review drivers of instrumented spine surgery cost and explain how surgeons can reduce costs without compromising outcome.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed. The literature review returned 217 citations. 27 publications were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The relevant literature on drivers of spine instrumented surgery cost is reviewed.

Results: The drivers of cost in instrumented spine surgery are varied and include implant costs, complications, readmissions, facility-based costs, surgeon-driven preferences, and patient comorbidities. Each major cost driver represents an opportunity for potential reductions in cost. With high resource utilization and often uncertain outcomes, spinal surgery has been heavily scrutinized by payers and hospital systems, with efforts to reduce costs and standardize surgical approach and care pathways.

Conclusions: Education about cost and commitment to standardization would be useful strategies to reduce cost without compromising patient-reported outcomes after instrumented spinal fusion.

Keywords: health costs; health resources; outcomes; patient readmission; spine procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the literature search for studies on cost drivers in spine fusion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303(13):1259–1265. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reese JC, Karsy M, Twitchell S, Bisson EF. Analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion healthcare costs via the value-driven outcomes tool. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(2):485–490. - PubMed
    1. Beckerman D, Esparza M, Lee SI, et al. Cost analysis of single-level lumbar fusions. Global Spine J. 2020;10(1):39–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chotai S, Sivaganesan A, Parker SL, Sielatycki JA, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ. Drivers of variability in 90-day cost for elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical degenerative disease. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(5):898–904. - PubMed
    1. Goyal A, Bhandarkar AR, Alvi MA, et al. Cost of readmissions following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: insights from the nationwide readmissions database. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(4):679–688. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources