PROMIS Global Health: Feasibility in home health
- PMID: 33893932
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02845-x
PROMIS Global Health: Feasibility in home health
Abstract
Purpose: This feasibility study assessed if the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) 10-item Global Health Survey (PROMIS-10) could be a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for a population of cognitively intact home health (HH) patients.
Methods: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) along with their measurement contractor, Abt Associates, held a field test (2016-2017) to test the feasibility of the PROMIS-10 in in the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). Home Health clinician data collectors (registered nurses and physical therapists) were trained to complete the PROMIS-10 along with procedures to facilitate patient self-administration of PROMIS-10. These clinicians provided feedback about their experiences at a focus group at the end of data collection.
Results: 213 HH patients comprised the field test sample, 150 of whom completed PROMIS-10 surveys. Clinicians reported they found the PROMIS-10 relevant and acceptable for their HH patients, and noted the surveys provided insight into patients' views of their health. The PROMIS-10 measured the full range of patient-reported health and was sensitive to change between admission and discharge.
Conclusions: The study confirmed that the PROMIS-10 can be implemented in the HH setting, opening the door for consideration for implementing the PROMIS-10 in post-acute care (PAC) settings. This study is a first step toward establishing an assessment that captures the patient's voice and could be reported by the CMS PAC quality reporting programs.
Keywords: CMS; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; Home health; IMPACT Act; PROMIS®; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality indicators; Quality reporting program.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. The National Academies Press.
-
- Tzelepis, F., Rose, S. K., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Clinton-McHarg, T., Carey, M. L., & Paul, C. L. (2014). Are we missing the Institute of Medicine’s mark? A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures assessing quality of patient-centred cancer care. BMC Cancer, 14, 41 - DOI
-
- Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm193282.pdf .
-
- Basch, E. (2014). New frontiers in patient-reported outcomes: Adverse event reporting, comparative effectiveness, and quality assessment. Annual Review of Medicine, 65(1), 307–317 - DOI
-
- Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., Hess, R., Miller, D. M., Reeve, B. B., & Santana, M. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1305–1314 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical