Peer support by interprofessional health care providers in aftermath of patient safety incidents: A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 33894076
- DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13345
Peer support by interprofessional health care providers in aftermath of patient safety incidents: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the health care professionals' preferences pertaining to support in the aftermath of patient safety incidents and potential variation thereof depending on the degree of harm.
Background: Peer support systems are available to support health care professionals in the aftermath of patient safety incidents. It is unclear which type of support is best offered by whom.
Methods: A cross-sectional study in 32 Dutch hospitals.
Results: In total, 2,362 nurses and 1,404 doctors indicated they were involved in patient safety incidents at any time during their career (86%). Less than 10% of health care providers had spoken with professional support, and less than 20% admitted a need to do so. They used different support. A higher degree of harm related to higher odds of desiring support. Respondents mainly wanted to understand what happened and how it can be prevented.
Conclusion: The desired support of health care professionals in the aftermath of patient safety incidents depends on the level of harm.
Implication for nursing management: Health care professionals seem to mostly rely on persons they are close with, and they mainly desire information related to the aftermath of patient safety incidents. This should be taken into account when support programmes are set up.
Keywords: health personnel/psychology; hospitals; patient safety; peer support.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Duration of second victim symptoms in the aftermath of a patient safety incident and association with the level of patient harm: a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands.BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e029923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029923. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31292185 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing health-care providers' readiness for reporting quality and patient safety indicators at primary health-care centres in Lebanon: a national cross-sectional survey.Hum Resour Health. 2015 May 22;13:37. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0031-5. Hum Resour Health. 2015. PMID: 25997430 Free PMC article.
-
Personal, situational and organizational aspects that influence the impact of patient safety incidents: A qualitative study.Rev Calid Asist. 2016 Jul;31 Suppl 2:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Apr 20. Rev Calid Asist. 2016. PMID: 27106771
-
Health professionals' perception of patient safety culture in acute hospitals: an integrative review.Aust Health Rev. 2018 Aug;42(4):387-394. doi: 10.1071/AH16274. Aust Health Rev. 2018. PMID: 28554000 Review.
-
A Critical Review: Moral Injury in Nurses in the Aftermath of a Patient Safety Incident.J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 May;52(3):320-328. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12551. Epub 2020 Mar 28. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020. PMID: 32222036 Review.
Cited by
-
Medical students' experiences, perceptions, and management of second victim: an interview study.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):786. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04763-7. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 37875909 Free PMC article.
-
The European Researchers' Network Working on Second Victim (ERNST) Policy Statement on the Second Victim Phenomenon for Increasing Patient Safety.Public Health Rev. 2024 Sep 18;45:1607175. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1607175. eCollection 2024. Public Health Rev. 2024. PMID: 39360222 Free PMC article.
-
Patient safety incidents in paediatric radiology: how to care for the professional?Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Mar;55(3):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06054-9. Epub 2024 Sep 18. Pediatr Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39292243 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Economic Value of Peer Support Program in German Hospitals.Int J Public Health. 2024 Jun 13;69:1607218. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607218. eCollection 2024. Int J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38939515 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Baas, M. A. M., Scheepstra, K. W. F., Stramrood, C. A. I., Evers, R., Dijksman, L. M., & van Pampus, M. G. (2018). Work-related adverse events leaving their mark: A cross-sectional study among Dutch gynecologists. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1659-1
-
- Clarkson, M. D., Haskell, H., Hemmelgarn, C., & Skolnik, P. J. (2019). Abandon the term “second victim”. BMJ, 364, l1233. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1233
-
- Coughlan, B., Powell, D., & Higgins, M. F. (2017). The second victim: A review. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 213, 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.002
-
- Johnson, J., Ford, E., Yu, J., Buckey, C., Fogh, S., & Evans, S. B. (2019). Peer support: A needs assessment for social support from trained peers in response to stress among medical physicists. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 20(9), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12675
-
- Kable, A., Kelly, B., & Adams, J. (2018). Effects of adverse events in health care on acute care nurses in an Australian context: A qualitative study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 20(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12409
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical